Tag Archives: 2028 US election

In 2028, the Democrats must not repeat their ‘Tim problem’

Despite it being more than two years away, there is a great deal of interest in the 2028 US presidential election. As such, there is fierce speculation about who the Democrats’ candidate will be. While it is a fool’s errand to definitively say who that will be – given the candidacies of past ‘shoo-ins’ such as Edmund Muskie or Gary Hart – it may be worth considering who their running mate could or should be.

The role of Vice President is not insignificant. Fifteen out of forty-five Presidents previously served as VP, with eight directly succeeding following deaths in office and one following resignation. As elected representatives, they cannot be fired or dismissed like appointed Cabinet secretaries. And as President of the Senate, they can cast deciding votes to resolve ties over budgetary bills.

During elections, running mates are meant to serve as campaign assets, balancing out a ticket geographically, ideologically and personally to gain wider appeal. As this position is not determined through primaries, it is up to successful nominees under advisement to consider and select the best possible running mate.

Democratic anxieties about 2028 stem from recent memories of 2016 and 2024. In 2016, US Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine served as Hilary Clinton’s running mate, and in 2024 Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz served as Kamala Harris’s. The losses of these tickets to Donald Trump – while baffling – may be attributable to several factors, the choice of running mate should not be dismissed.

Geographically, neither Tim gave their respective tickets an advantage as they both came from reliably Democratic states on the peripheries of key US regions they were meant to represent (the South and the Rust Belt). As the Electoral College means that elections hinge on outcomes in a handful of swing states, there was no benefit having both halves of the ticket come from safe states.

Demographically, both Tims were meant to be ‘inoffensive’, balancing out tickets headed by women, seeking the highest office in a country where many voters are sceptical about the idea of a female President. While there was speculation that Clinton could nominate Elizabeth Warren, Harris voiced in her memoir 107 Days that her preferred choice of Pete Buttigieg was too risky, the combination of a black woman and a gay man potentially alienating voters. This has led to the belief that the next Democratic nominee needs to be a straight, white man.

Posted in Op-eds | 1 Comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    @ David Allen The general public won’t notice your fine distinctions. It might notice a strong showing from a truly liberal party against democratic social...
  • Peter Davies
    Where we work we save our deposit....
  • Michael BG
    Paul Barker, Sorry I spelt your name incorrectly. Peter Martin The insurance concept is also kept for those receiving New Style Jobseekers Allowance (l...
  • David Allen
    "If we let the Greens win here it’s bad news for all our MPs..." The choice is between letting the Greens score a big (maybe winning) vote against a Lib De...
  • Rose Runswick
    @Pawel I agree totally, even if we lose a deposit there is much to be gained from a strong campaign in terms of local party teambuilding and fundraising from po...