Tag Archives: Data Protection Regulation

Paddy’s Dangerous Idea No. 2

Following on from my post last week on Paddy’s Dangerous Idea No. 1, I am delving into his second proposal. Paddy argued:

We have long understood that property owning rights are one of the foundation stones of democracy. Yet each of us gives away our most intimate of property free and daily to the most powerful corporations, who make millions and millions from it. I am talking of course, about our personal data.

Why do we Lib Dems not assert the citizens right to own their own data and to have control over how it is used? Why about proposing a law – perhaps a European one – which says to Messrs Amazon, Google, Starbucks etc, that they can use our personal data for their commercial purposes, but only with our permission and if they give us a share of the profits. Can you think of anything which would more alter the relationship between these masters of the commercial universe and the customers whose information they exploit for such enormous profit? Can you think of anything which would more empower the citizen in the market place? Isn’t that what we Lib Dems are supposed to be about? So?

I really like this idea. Ownership of our own data gives us not only control over who does what with our data but means we can expect to be paid if others use our data, especially if they make money from it. It might seem radical, but it makes a lot of sense.

The arguments over whether we own our bodies and separated bodily material have been extensively debated. If we do own our bodies, shouldn’t our data also be owned by us – isn’t our data inherently who we are?

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 9 Comments

Sarah Ludford writes …Creating EU Data Protection rules that safeguard both privacy and jobs

As those who read this LibDem Voice article by Peter Bradwell of Open Rights group will know, I am currently the ALDE (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe) group ‘shadow rapporteur’ on the draft EU Data Protection Regulation in the European Parliament.

I was not originally expecting to play a major role on this particular piece of legislation. But when my German FDP colleague Alexander Alvaro unfortunately suffered a serious car accident in February, the ALDE group appointed me as his interim replacement. I unwisely promised a response to Peter’s article ‘soon’! – but the last few months of negotiations have been very demanding. The new Regulation, unlike …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Feb - 9:26pm
    Joe and I'm sure you still haven't answered the point I raised which was that What I am interested is why you think that Plato’s...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 19th Feb - 9:11pm
    @ JoeB, "....... less stringent rules for public finances, under which the government would be allowed to borrow for investment but not day-to-day spending." You're...
  • User Avatarnvelope2003 19th Feb - 9:08pm
    TCO knows a lot more about things than many people would like to admit. Too many ideologues about who are unwilling to face facts or...
  • User Avatarexpats 19th Feb - 9:08pm
    When the policy of workers in company boardrooms was Labour's it was "far left social engineering". When did that change?
  • User AvatarWilliam Francis 19th Feb - 8:51pm
    @Tim Murray "I would argue that the outsourced worker would want representation on the board of their employer, not the client where they may be...
  • User AvatarTim Murray 19th Feb - 8:37pm
    Having worked for most of my life in businesses that provide outsourced services I would argue that the outsourced worker would want representation on the...