Tag Archives: Data Protection Regulation

Paddy’s Dangerous Idea No. 2

Following on from my post last week on Paddy’s Dangerous Idea No. 1, I am delving into his second proposal. Paddy argued:

We have long understood that property owning rights are one of the foundation stones of democracy. Yet each of us gives away our most intimate of property free and daily to the most powerful corporations, who make millions and millions from it. I am talking of course, about our personal data.

Why do we Lib Dems not assert the citizens right to own their own data and to have control over how it is used? Why about proposing a law – perhaps a European one – which says to Messrs Amazon, Google, Starbucks etc, that they can use our personal data for their commercial purposes, but only with our permission and if they give us a share of the profits. Can you think of anything which would more alter the relationship between these masters of the commercial universe and the customers whose information they exploit for such enormous profit? Can you think of anything which would more empower the citizen in the market place? Isn’t that what we Lib Dems are supposed to be about? So?

I really like this idea. Ownership of our own data gives us not only control over who does what with our data but means we can expect to be paid if others use our data, especially if they make money from it. It might seem radical, but it makes a lot of sense.

The arguments over whether we own our bodies and separated bodily material have been extensively debated. If we do own our bodies, shouldn’t our data also be owned by us – isn’t our data inherently who we are?

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 9 Comments

Sarah Ludford writes …Creating EU Data Protection rules that safeguard both privacy and jobs

As those who read this LibDem Voice article by Peter Bradwell of Open Rights group will know, I am currently the ALDE (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe) group ‘shadow rapporteur’ on the draft EU Data Protection Regulation in the European Parliament.

I was not originally expecting to play a major role on this particular piece of legislation. But when my German FDP colleague Alexander Alvaro unfortunately suffered a serious car accident in February, the ALDE group appointed me as his interim replacement. I unwisely promised a response to Peter’s article ‘soon’! – but the last few months of negotiations have been very demanding. The new Regulation, unlike …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatartheakes 12th Nov - 5:59pm
    Received emails from ITV and BBC this afternoon. The former still exclude Jo but of course there is the court hearing. The BBC are seemingl;y...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 12th Nov - 5:57pm
    A timely reminder of how quickly politicians forget and sacrifice allies for a quick short term fix on the road to long term disaster. Thank...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 12th Nov - 5:48pm
    Christine is right, Brexit trumps every issue. Here is Prof Chris Grey, from his blog, 'The Brexit Blog, "As prefigured in my previous post, this...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 12th Nov - 5:33pm
    I completely agree with Alex's comment "to decide that something is ‘de facto’ binding is dangerous, because then who decides when it is no longer...
  • User AvatarMack 12th Nov - 5:22pm
    @Alex Mcfie: “Making parliamentary pledges binding on future legislators is an absolute attack on parliamentary sovereignty, and thus on democracy.” You know very well that...
  • User Avatarfrankie 12th Nov - 5:16pm
    If you print to much money you destroy the credablity of the currency and you end up with its value dropping. You cannot therefore print...