Tag Archives: data ownership

Paddy’s Dangerous Idea No. 2

Following on from my post last week on Paddy’s Dangerous Idea No. 1, I am delving into his second proposal. Paddy argued:

We have long understood that property owning rights are one of the foundation stones of democracy. Yet each of us gives away our most intimate of property free and daily to the most powerful corporations, who make millions and millions from it. I am talking of course, about our personal data.

Why do we Lib Dems not assert the citizens right to own their own data and to have control over how it is used? Why about proposing a law – perhaps a European one – which says to Messrs Amazon, Google, Starbucks etc, that they can use our personal data for their commercial purposes, but only with our permission and if they give us a share of the profits. Can you think of anything which would more alter the relationship between these masters of the commercial universe and the customers whose information they exploit for such enormous profit? Can you think of anything which would more empower the citizen in the market place? Isn’t that what we Lib Dems are supposed to be about? So?

I really like this idea. Ownership of our own data gives us not only control over who does what with our data but means we can expect to be paid if others use our data, especially if they make money from it. It might seem radical, but it makes a lot of sense.

The arguments over whether we own our bodies and separated bodily material have been extensively debated. If we do own our bodies, shouldn’t our data also be owned by us – isn’t our data inherently who we are?

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 9 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 19th Mar - 8:40am
    John we have a failed political system and Brexit has shown it has failed spectacularly, but our politicians are happy with Buggins turn failure, so...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 19th Mar - 8:32am
    I know it’s a little premature at the moment; but, whenever the history of these irritating/fascinating/enthralling times is finally written, I wonder whether anyone will...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 19th Mar - 8:14am
    @ David Allen, But if “No Deal” is excluded, we risk a massive campaign for spoiled ballot papers and even rioting, against what would be...
  • User AvatarKeith Legg 19th Mar - 6:25am
    I agree with Caron to a point - I think we need now to revoke Article 50, but yes, this is going to cause the...
  • User AvatarKeith Legg 19th Mar - 5:30am
    @OnceALibDem - that's why those of us in the Scottish Young Liberal Democrats nicknamed them MYLDEW (Mostly Young Liberal Democrats of England and Wales)....
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 19th Mar - 3:53am
    Revocation is of course the most rational course of action, and I do not believe in an important public backlash. The immediate and substantial sterling...