Tag Archives: Government eavesdropping

‘High Risk Vendors’ and Government eavesdropping

Last Tuesday, Parliament debated the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property), Bill. Well, actually, it didn’t. Several Tory backbenchers and a Labour shadow Minister hijacked the debate with amendments seeking to exclude ‘High-Risk Vendors’ (by which they mean Huawei) from UK telecoms networks. They did not provide any evidence to support their concerns, and the speeches sometimes bordered on a witch hunt.

Robert Harrison and Paul Reynolds have both written balanced and insightful articles on Huawei for Lib Dem Voice. The Government currently proposes to limit ‘High-Risk Vendors’ to the access network, and 35% market share. In a comment on Paul’s article, I explained how the 5G standards are designed to prevent any eavesdropping within the access network.

There is a well-documented case where an equipment supplier has been compromised by a foreign Government so that it could intercept the secret communications of other nations. But this is neither Huawei nor China: the company is Crypto AG, and the foreign Government is the USA.

Posted in Op-eds | 4 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • expats
    David Allen 5th Oct '26 - 1:50pm...........It is “controversial” to advocate that Israel be “replaced” by a single Palestinian state, as the Greens have...
  • Ian Dixon
    @David Allen not for the first time I wish there was a like button on this site....
  • David Allen
    "To my mind, any political philosophy that believes that members of one race should be removed from an area to enable members of another race to move in and liv...
  • David Allen
    "Low Tax Party" means - Denialist, selfish, irresponsible. Our courts are years behind schedule, which means justice denied. Our NHS is killing patients in ...
  • David Raw
    @ Mick Taylor "Labour have always failed to deliver on electoral reform". Incorrect, I'm afraid, Mick. They delivered PR for Holyrood and the Senedd...........