Tag Archives: james delingpole

Stephen Tall

The welfare debate and the age of the trollemic

By Stephen Tall | Thu 4th April 2013 - 9:25 am

I decided to invent a new word yesterday:

It’s the welfare debate that’s prompted it, but it could be any other topic on a given week.

daily mail philpott front pageYesterday saw the Daily Mail publish a typically sensationalist front page blaming the welfare state for the tragedy of six children being killed by their parents. On Monday the Mirror shouted ‘Shameful’, with a cartoon showing Thatcher, Cameron, Osorne and Clegg banging in the final nail of a coffin marked ‘RIP Welfare’.

Each is exaggerating to make their own point. Both are gross over-statements: trollemics.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , , , and | 26 Comments
Mark Pack

Ah, now I see why I’m paid by neither the Daily Telegraph nor the Spectator

By Mark Pack | Fri 28th January 2011 - 8:55 am

You see, when I write about topics such as election law and psephology, I frequently check to see what is said in peer-reviewed academic papers. Particularly when I’m disagreeing with what people have claimed in such academic papers because, after all, saying something is wrong without actually taking a look at it is a bit of a risky leap of faith isn’t it?

But seeing what James Delingpole says, I can see where I’ve been going wrong. Clearly if I want to be a serious proper writer who gets published regularly by the Daily Telegraph or the Spectator the thing to remember is that criticising peer-reviewed papers (and indeed accusing authors of being in a conspiracy) is most properly done by never actually looking at them yourself:

Continue reading »
Posted in News | 14 Comments
Alex Foster

Three “disgusting, eco-fascist, bullying” questions for Conservatives

By Alex Foster | Thu 28th January 2010 - 11:18 am

Cast your world-weary, battle-hardened, politico and political eyes over this disgusting filth spewing from the keyboard of swivel-eyed maniacs working through the night on behalf of some disreputable campaign to send vile messes to hard working Tory PPCs:

Can you clarify that:

You accept that climate change is caused by human activity?

Do you support the target to achieve 15% renewable energy by 2020?

Do you support the EU imposing tougher regulation to combat climate change?

Hardly the worst questions a campaigner will receive.

In my brief time working in politics both as an elected representative myself and for MEPs and MPs, I have seen some …

Continue reading »
Posted in News and Online politics | Also tagged , , , and | 3 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Paul Baker, The £16,000 limit on total savings for those of working age on benefits hasn’t been changed since 2013. If someone has more savings than this ...
  • Rose Runswick
    I appreciate the concerns here that we are not in the running for this Seat currently, but this has not always been the case, at one stage we were the main chal...
  • Tim Rogers
    I agree. We are not in the running for this seat. However we must hope that Green party do not win. Next year's local elections are going to be truly massive an...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I would not put any national resources into this by election. It looks extremely unpromising, as it will clearly be a two horse race between Labour and Greens. ...
  • Katharine Pindar
    What can be seen as 'progressive' new taxation, for Andy Burnham and his Chancellor to try in order to raise further much-needed funds? Not surely by any means ...