Tag Archives: mick philpott

The Philpott case: at last, a reminder of the reality

justice thirlwall phlpott caseThe debate over the Philpott case has raged all week, but mostly at a tangent to the reality of the case.

Thanks to Grace Dent’s stellar column in today’s Independent, I’ve finally read through Mrs Justice Thirlwall’s summing up. It’s concise, shrewd, plain spoken, unsparing: no legalese, just clear sense.

It returns this case to where it belongs: an individual story of one man’s obsessive compulsion to dominate and possess all those around him, in particular ‘his’ women. It’s well worth reading the whole judgment in full.

However, there are three sections I wanted to highlight…

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 4 Comments

The welfare debate and the age of the trollemic

I decided to invent a new word yesterday:

It’s the welfare debate that’s prompted it, but it could be any other topic on a given week.

daily mail philpott front pageYesterday saw the Daily Mail publish a typically sensationalist front page blaming the welfare state for the tragedy of six children being killed by their parents. On Monday the Mirror shouted ‘Shameful’, with a cartoon showing Thatcher, Cameron, Osorne and Clegg banging in the final nail of a coffin marked ‘RIP Welfare’.

Each is exaggerating to make their own point. Both are gross over-statements: trollemics.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , , , and | 26 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chris Webb
    There are clearly more Tonbridge One-Nation types in the South than the North, but if one characterises them as evidence-based, internationalist, caring and tho...
  • paul barker
    If we want to seem relevant to young Voters Labour have given us a couple of good opportunities with the proposal to cut benefits for the under-25s & the w...
  • Chris Webb
    Welcome Cody; “wetter than a Dogger Bank trawler” they said, not realising that even by then such craft were rarities. I left once they failed for a second ...
  • Mick Taylor
    Referenda/Referendums?? How typical of LibDems to argue about semantics rather than the substantive point....
  • Mick Taylor
    @Andrew Tampion. As the current UK constitution (unwritten) stands, then yes. You can't have one rule for things you like and another for things you don't like....