Tag Archives: spousal income requirement

Lib Dem Immigrants

For richer, for poorer

By Lib Dem Immigrants | Tue 12th February 2019 - 5:19 pm

For Valentine’s day, Lib Dem Immigrants is showcasing some canine (and feline) couples, with a serious message. Many people who’ve not had cause to find out the hard way don’t realise that mixed-nationality couples can be forbidden from living together in the UK if they don’t earn enough. We want to raise awareness of this, and we’re proud that Lib Dem policy is to oppose it. If you’re married to a British person, you should be allowed to live with them. No means-testing. For richer, for poorer. šŸ¾

Lina is a Dachshund from Munich, Germany; Jamie is an English Bulldog from Croydon. Jamie worries about whether Brexit will mean Lina can’t come and live with him.

Kuniko is a Shiba Inu from Kyoto, Japan. Gary is a Jack Russell Terrier from Bolton. Gary’s income is just enough for Kuniko to be allowed here ā€” but not enough for their puppies too. They don’t know what they should do.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , and | 5 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    I'm not sure liberalism is all about equalising wealth. But it's certainly a large chunk of it. Reward is also important though there are greater rewards than w...
  • Peter Hirst
    I love this quote from The New Deal. For a publc utility like water it is especially true. To give shareholders dividends the company must first show it respect...
  • Peter Hirst
    What struck me about this post was the reference to 2019. We're told to build on our successes. We can also build on our failures if we get the messaging right....
  • Peter Martin
    ā€œBut youā€™re a Lib Dem, I thought your party didnā€™t like unions.ā€ You have to ask why people think this. LibDems are largely seen as well m...
  • Alex Macfie
    What's needed is to make the rail service operationally independent of government. There is absolutely no sense in GB-wide passenger rail services being microma...