The Independent View: Should G8 leaders be making a new commitment to reduce hunger?

There are close to a billion people going hungry every day. I find the scale of this hard to imagine, but if I’m honest even the personal experience of going hungry for a day is something I can’t easily relate to. I’m lucky enough to have never really experienced hunger, living as I do in a relatively wealthy country, where even if I were unwell or unemployed the state would support me with basic social protection.

The worst thing about global hunger is that it is an unnecessary injustice. We actually produce enough globally to feed everyone, but people don’t have equal access to it. Many people just can’t afford to buy the food they need. Others struggle to grow enough from small plots of land.

Concern

Triphonie Bosenibo and her husband Daniel Bwanakweri sharing a family meal with their 7 children. They are farmers who live in Gakenke District, Rwanda.

When world leaders meet at the G8 summit on May 19th, they will be discussing the L’Aquila Food Security Initiative (AFSI) and the possibility of new hunger commitment to replace it. The AFSI pledge, made by G8 donors in reaction to the food price spike of 2008/09, committed G8 countries to focus aid spending on rural development and agriculture. It expires this year.

Encouragingly, under the US presidency the G8 will focus on food security, agriculture and nutrition. The US will then actively support the UK’s G8 presidency in 2013. In a factsheet released by DFID and USAID, these two departments state:

“We will take concrete steps to strengthen food security in Africa, working with African countries, other development partners, and especially the private sector. We will encourage investments in agricultural development and large scale interventions to promote inclusive economic growth and alleviate hunger.”

Concern welcomes this joint commitment, but we would like the UK Government to go even further. We’re asking for the UK to lead the way by pushing for all G8 leaders to agree a new hunger commitment, building solid foundations for this at the US summit and then driving the commitment through during the UK presidency in 2013. Concern is also asking that the new commitment is developed in partnership with poorer countries, and that its success is measured not through funds delivered but through impact on hunger reduction.

We’re asking supporters to email their MPs with our two minute online action, which generates an editable template email asking your MP to write to the Prime Minister regarding a new hunger commitment. If enough MPs write, quoting emails from constituents, this will give a clear message that the UK public care about hunger.

* Natasha Adams is Campaigns and Parliamentary Officer at Concern Worldwide (UK). Find out more about Concern Worldwide UK’s campaign, Unheard Voices, championing the cause of smallholder farmers.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Richard Dean 7th Apr '12 - 11:49am

    Yes, they should. Hunger is an abomination in the modern world, particularly child hunger. But it is caused as much by humans as by the planet. Aid is a damage as well as a life-saver. Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach him to fish and he will decimate the fishes, give him a political ideology and he will screw something up for sure, teach him to fish responsibly and he will eat for ever.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 6th Apr - 1:53am
    “Fairness, Opportunity, Inclusivity and Hope” doesn’t sound very radical. Turning the first sentence of the preamble to the Constitution round, Liberal Democrats aim to eradicate...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 6th Apr - 1:41am
    David Raw, yes, that's a fair comment. I think the Blair/Brown government got a lot of things right bar the Iraq war. There were other...
  • User AvatarGeoff Reid 5th Apr - 11:21pm
    During the dark days of 1939-1945 service personnel were actually encouraged to debate the sort of society they wanted to see when it was all...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 5th Apr - 11:16pm
    Peter: "As a Leave supporter, I would urge the party to accept the democratic will." Democracy is a continuous process. The whole point of having...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 5th Apr - 11:15pm
    @ Joe B. So it's a matter of theory rather than actual political practice then, Joe ? You say, "Conscription came with an exemption for...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 5th Apr - 10:57pm
    Peter Martin, it seems to me the contradictions are only in your head and not with the analysts at the Bank of England. The financial...
Mon 27th Apr 2020