The promise and the peril of not being a one-man band

Ever since the Liberal Democrats were founded, we’ve had the sight of the national media only being interested at most in one figure – the party’s leader – yet also running regular reports about how the party is a one-man band. Cause and effect anyone?

With the rise of Vince Cable to public prominence – and popularity – the party now faces a different challenge: how best to turn the team of Clegg and Cable into votes for the party.

The idea of running tickets in election campaigns is nothing new – Mayor and Deputy Mayor, President and Vice President, and so on. It is not an easy trick to get right, especially in these instant media days where the merest hint of disagreement between the duo becomes stories of chaos, catastrophe and calamity.

Picking your words with care, consistently and without thereby lapsing into simply mouthing vacuous statements, is a darn hard act. Credit is certainly due to Chris Huhne for managing that since the leadership election as, particularly in the months immediately after it, the media would have been only too happy to big up any hint of a difference between him and Nick Clegg.

Now Nick Clegg and Vince Cable face that same challenge: how to talk regularly and interestingly in the media whilst remaining closely in step all the time. The prize for getting it right is great. But the alternative would be a descent into the failures of the David Owen / David Steel dual leadership of the Alliance. 1987 reprised? No thanks.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Stanley Theed 24th Sep '09 - 9:36pm

    I agree. I am sure both Nick and Vince are aware of the danger of appearing to disagree or of making an unguarded comment, particularly during the weeks leading up to the General Election. This is particularly so with Vince. I am sure that the Tories would delight in having his reputation reduced to their level. Although he is a terrific asset the party must ensure too many demands are not made on him on what will be a hectic general election campaign.

  • Vince seemed to get a bit big for his boots this conference season and had to be shouted down by a few colleagues. Clegg needs to keep Vince as an asset but take more of a lead in the economic areas so he doesn’t look like he’s being led by the nose. Also – handcuff him and Vince together from now until the election – everything they do should be together if at all possible, sell them as a dream team and maybe Vince’s popularity will finally start to help the party before the media finally turn on him (as they’ve started to do over the ‘mansion tax’ – possibly because they all have homes over £1 million??? Surely not!)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Andrew Melmoth
    - Anders Larson There is no mystery about how the Duke of Westminster was able to largely avoid inheritance tax. He used on legal structures established by the...
  • ANDERS LARSON
    @Simon R there were probably many schemes used in combination, some domestic some international. But that doesn't answser the core problem, which is that even i...
  • John McHugo
    @Chris Caswill - you mention the "Middle England test". Middle England is outraged by what has been happening in Gaza - it is also outraged by 7 October, but do...
  • Steve Trevthan
    Thank you for an excellent article with verifying sources! Might it also be the case that our government, and other "Western" governments, are not speaking o...
  • William Wallace
    I'm nervous about using 'the politics of envy' as a jibe against redistributive taxation. Yes, it's what the Mail and the Express say repeatedly. But inequali...