There are around 3.8million homes available for social rent in England – around 60% are owned by Housing Associations and the rest by Local Authorities.
There is plenty of talk among Lib Dems about the need for more social housing – access to safe, warm and affordable homes is a key part of happy and healthy lives but the reality for many social housing tenants is very far from those ideals. Damp, mould, huge bills to heat draughty homes and bodged repairs are frequent complaints. Our Councillors and MPs often receive large numbers of complaints from social housing tenants and while it would be nice to think that local authorities gave a more responsive service than Housing Associations, that is very much not the case. The London Borough of Southwark, London’s largest social landlord, has an appalling record of leaving tenants in shocking conditions with the third highest number of Housing Ombudsman complaints in the UK[1].
Given how many people live in social housing, it is surprising how little attention is paid to them. It’s striking for example that in Parliament, despite MPs’ inboxes being full of emails about problems with social housing, there are All Party Parliamentary Groups (APPG) for MPs and Peers interested in everything from AI to Autism and Fisheries to Fusion Energy but those dedicated to social housing appear defunct.
Our 2019 manifesto briefly covered people living in social housing. We said we would:
Protect the rights of social renters by:
Proactively enforcing clear standards for homes that are socially rented, including strict time limits for repairs.
Fully recognising tenant panels so that renters have a voice in landlord governance.
And in our 2024 manifesto, our focus was on building many more homes including 150,000 for social rent each year.
This is a start ,but we believe that we need to develop our policy further on how tenants are treated. Last year the London Region Conference passed ahttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1fwpYMkvpWf8Ig2oWwIHjgtTpsxvxuzD0/view?emci=8df21df7-3ccf-ee11-85f9-002248223794&emdi=5ce7031f-70cf-ee11-85f9-002248223794&ceid=380135“> motion on A Positive Vision for Social Housing.
(Pages 6-8)
We would like to bring a motion to Federal Conference to develop our policy and would welcome input from our Councillors, activists and members on this. Please send your ideas to: [email protected]
[1] Southwark has the third highest number of housing Ombudsman complaints in UK – Southwark News
* Rachel is the Deputy Leader of the Lib Dem Group on Southwark Council and Simon is Whip of the Lib Dem Group on Merton Council
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The Disneyfication of Haley Mills
Survation now put Andy Burnham 10 points ahead in Makerfield
Michael Meadowcroft: A Liberal of Intellectual Rigour and Uncommon Integrity
Debt-ridden graduates claim they are seen as cash cows
Ruth Bright
BigTallTim
Daniel Walker
Richard Good
Matt (Bristol)
4 Comments
I have been a passionate supporter of social housing for decades and I played a leading role in the campaign against Tory plans to transfer the West Berkshire council stock to a private landlord.
A great deal of our current problems today relate to the difficulties in obtaining affordable homes to rent. Thatcher wanted to create a market in housing whereby private landlords could make huge profits and she succeeded.
As a party we need to be arguing strongly for a plentiful supply of social housing at rents tenants can afford.
Labour have promised this but will they deliver?
P.S. Is Lib Dem social housing a group or just an email address?
David
Thanks for your comment. I am not sure myself that was Mrs Thatcher’s motive -i think she believed in home ownership and it was of course a hugely popular policy.
At the moment there is not a group – the email address is just to make it easier to reply
Shades of Thames Water where Directors and shareholders soak up real or imaginary profits whilst neglecting the company/tenants.
Anything we can say or do to highlight/change that would be very, very much welcomed by those tenants suffering in such neglected properties.
Excellent points. Not just Southwark. There was a mind-boggling scandal in Newham Borough with council flats being ‘transferred’ to a local organisation closely linked to the Council which then rented at higher rents and cut back on repair spending. There was another scandal in Tower Hamlets. The housing standards staff in my local authority in West London cite ‘social housing providers contracted to the local authorty’ as the major problem in housing conditions in the Boro. Lack of accountability among local authorities, both regulatory and provision, seems like the underlying difficulty, with gold plating of repair & mainenance contracts representing a major political challenge. Tories make similar complaints about social housing but refuse to back the steps needed to ensure accountability and transparency.