Welcome to my day: 4 November 2024 – “I’ve got a ticket to ride”

I found myself enjoying some free bus rides yesterday. And no, I don’t have a concessionary bus pass – I’m not that old… yet – but our local Transport Museum here in Ipswich was having a vintage running day, with a collection of vintage buses operating three routes around the town. It all seemed somehow appropriate given the controversy over bus fares this week.

In choosing to freeze fuel duty whilst partially removing the fare cap on bus journeys, Rachel Reeves made a curious choice. Whilst yes, it will be popular with motorists, cheaper bus fares have been a boon to those outside major cities where the fare cap had little or no impact – in London, for example, the flat fare is £1.75. And, by shifting the financial incentives further towards cars, it hardly sends out a message that the Government is taking Net Zero seriously.

But it’s just another clumsy move by a a government which seems capable of little else, at least as far as the media are concerned. Even setting aside the inherent bias of much of the mainstream media though, an administration which came into power offering competence and integrity has burnt through quite a lot of credibility remarkably early in the piece. And, whilst the levels of incompetence and “sleaze” are minor compared to the chaotic shambles that was the Conservative government post-2019, expectations were rather higher.

Meanwhile, the Conservatives have, as many of us suspected would happen all along, picked Kemi Badenoch to be their new leader. It seems unlikely that she’ll survive long enough to fight a General Election given the fractiousness of the Party, and without a strong policy core, she may have to be opportunistic in her approach. And given her tendency to speak first and claim to have been misrepresented second, it could be interesting to watch. Not necessarily pretty, but interesting nonetheless.

Robert Saunders has written a fascinating piece on the challenges that she, and the party she leads, face in the coming years, and it’s well worth the read. His view, and I think it’s a fair one, is that the Conservatives need to work out what they believe in and build some policy that might credibly deliver that. I’d add to that the need to rediscover unity, a task made more challenging by electing a leader with such a low level of support amongst the Parliamentary Party. And with a plethora of competing groups espousing competing and often contradictory approaches, Kemi’s silence on policy issues risks leaving a vacuum for others to fill.

All this does leave Labour some time to deliver something which might claw back public support but it also offers a space for us to influence the debate. Of course, as the third party, we do need to be a bit opportunistic too, but it would be nice if we could demonstrate something a bit more than being “nice” or “vaguely likeable”. We can, and should, be offering a truly liberal option to voters, as if we’re not doing it, nobody else will. And, with voters clearly shopping around for a party they can trust, standing for something philosophically coherent might just be a draw.

And finally, given that there’s the small matter of a US Presidential election coming up, I thought that I ought to mark the election of the first woman of colour to Congress sixty years ago yesterday. The Associated Press covered the news:

The major victory was the election of the first woman from the newest state – Hawaii – Mrs Patsy Takemoto Mink, a 37-year-old lawyer-state legislator. she is the only newcomer to join the ranks of women in Congress.

The new face – and a pretty one it is – will be that of the first woman of Oriental ancestry to serve in Congress.

The shapely Congresswoman-elect is well-known in Hawaii for her work in the legislature when the state was still a territory. She is a Democrat.

We’ve come on a fair bit since then, thanks heavens. Let’s hope that Kamala Harris can come through, and keep the madness of Trump at bay…

* Mark Valladares is the Monday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • “In choosing to freeze fuel duty whilst partially removing the fare cap on bus journeys Rachel Reeves made a curious choice.”

    Indeed she did.

    It is also worth noting that on the day of the Budget it also slipped out that from the 2 March 2025 regulated train fares in England will increase by 4.6% (more than inflation) and the price of most railcards by £5.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62j7q452jro#

    We should also not forget that even before the Budget she made the decision to scrap the Restoring Your Railway Fund, which was a fund designed to support the re-opening of railway lines.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg3e45yxe8xo

  • Jenny Barnes 4th Nov '24 - 11:51am

    I think the £2 bus fare cap was a good policy. But it’s a bit unfair to blame Reeves for increasing it, as it terminated at the end of 2024 with no funding. Another Tory trap. So a £3 cap is not as good as the previous policy, but it’s considerably better than the Tory legacy situation.

  • Martin Gray 4th Nov '24 - 8:02pm

    Some people have to take two buses to work there and back a day …That’s £960 a year to them – most of which are low paid workers …
    Yet again this government targets those that are struggling – with this and the WFA, labour obviously despises those at the bottom…

  • Colin Brown 5th Nov '24 - 12:21pm

    I’ll be 69 this week and have had a bus pass since 60. Although I have a decent pension, I really value the freedom it offers – freedom to get out and about, and freedom from using my car. But I am convinced it has other benefits. I am sure I walk more and faster and further, aiding my physical and mental health, because I know I can hop on a bus if I get tired out. That has to be a preventative measure for the health service.

  • Nonconformistradical 5th Nov '24 - 2:35pm

    I’m quite a bit older than Colin and as a rural resident I don’t have a regular bus service. There’s a ‘dial-a-ride’ system – that allows me to book a ride within a specific locality. But it all depends on the service being able to pick one up at an appropriate time and bring one back at a appropriate time. It doesn’t work very will in my view – one certainly couldn’t rely on it to e.g. go shopping on a particular morning and be brought back home.

    I think there is a need for community minibuses which might, to some extent, run to a timetable, so that residents have some idea when it will be in their area and hence when to use it for shopping etc. Such a service might also be used for regular morning and early evening commuter runs in rural areas if there is a local rail station.

    Fortunately I can still drive, albeit mobility problems make it difficult for me to get into / out of my (fuel-efficient) car.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    @Simon R "We should certainly be asking why it’s apparently so hard to make a good profit by farming and producing food (supermarkets’ oligopoly? price com...
  • David Garlick
    The EU problem made worse by UK leaving . Started like most bad decisions by our dreadful Conservatives....
  • Simon R
    There seem to be a fair few comments that hint that IHT should be lower for farmers because farming produces so little income. But those seem like separate iss...
  • Mick Taylor
    @nonconformistradical. I am making no value judegments at all about value to society. It just seems to me that IHT (or any other tax) should fall equally on peo...
  • Diana Simpson
    I'm shocked! Not at the party goers antics but the fact that any Lib Dems would eat oreos manufactured by Mondelez a company renowned for its anti-green practic...