Like many Liberal Democrats I have been viewing with concern the developments at Twitter where it appears that a right-wing takeover of the Company could damage its reasonably justifiable claim that it is a platform for free speech but where extremes are moderated.
That raises to my mind questions about how we should consider the developments both as a Party and as individual Lib Dems. I have already registered on Mastodon which is a sort of Twitter although I have neither done much on it nor got many followers on my account. I have noticed though that a few people on Twitter have also looked at this route and have now begun to follow me.
In the short term I intend to do the occasional repeat on Mastodon that I do on Twitter and see what happens. I have about 11,000 Twitter followers and am in regular discourse with many of them, so I don’t want to lose them unless I feel morally or politically obliged to do so.
My concern is the way that Twitter could go. The new Twitter owner is an apologist for Russia at least as far as Ukraine is concerned. He is a huge polluter with his Space X promoting vanity trips into space at a huge environmental cost. He hides behind a veneer of environmentalism with his TESLA cars but there appears to be no commitment here other than to make even more money.
What he does outside Twitter is his concern. I certainly will neither be going into space nor buying a TESLA car although my next care will be an electric one. What he does on Twitter however is a matter of real public concern as it has such domination of that part of the social media sector. Within a week of taking control of the company he sacked half its staff. Crucially, to my mind, his axe fell hardest on the moderators who looked at content.
Here he may have gone too far. There is a laissez-faire attitude to such matters in the USA which is his main concern but, in the UK, and the EU we have harder rules and regulations on these matters. I can see a time developing quickly where our regulators will first place demands on Twitter and then possibly followed by fines.
The ultimate sanction will be, of course, banning it in our air space. I would regret that because I believe in moderation and persuasion and not compulsion and force but if push comes to shove…! It is already clear that things are changing on this site. The use of the N word has increased 500% in just one week. It is not clear whether this is because of less moderation or because more people feel emboldened by the ownership change. Only time will tell.
The biggest test will be if Donald Trump is allowed back on. Twitter and Facebook banned him because of his lies and clear racism and attacks on democracy within weeks of him losing the Presidential Election. That will be a clear time to move out of the channel.
Already though the channel is losing a lot of advertisers with some big names not being prepared to risk their reputation alongside the potential right wing move in. They have already taken a big revenue hit for next year’s budget with pre bookings at a specific media sales event slumping. This might mean that the new owner comes to his senses and does maintain an impartiality and fact checking service which could be useful. The problem will be if he does not.
As an individual I will have an easy choice. If I am not happy with what happens I will just go and move everything to Mastodon and slowly build it up.
Could we allow public information to be put out through a media which includes many distorted and impartial messages. Twitter has been very effective in getting quick messages out and the Council will need to replace it.
Should the standard media, such as the Liverpool Echo, which is now so heavily dependent on clickbait be associated with a media route which could be the exact opposite of the social concerns and policies which it claims to espouse.
Should the Liberal Democrats abandon the millions of followers that we have between us to go into uncharted waters when we need to communicate in as many ways as possible both on a day to day basis and an electoral basis with our residents and citizens.
It is too early to tell what we might do but it is not too early to think about what we might do should circumstances change. If things do go the wrong way the last thing that we want is to have no alternative options in hand.
So that is my suggestion. Watch carefully and prepare thoughtfully in case action needs to be taken. I have done my thinking. Will you now do yours?
In the meantime, I think it would make sense for us to start registering with an alternative. You can do this with Mastodon. If you want to follow me, I am @liverpoolrichard
* Cllr Richard Kemp CBE is Lord Mayor of Liverpool for 2024-2025.
6 Comments
I am amazed that so many people have stuck with twitter even before the recent takeover by the appalling Elon Musk. I closed my twitter account in 2019, because I could not stand the lies, distortions and half truths that were apparently accepted as fact by the twitter moderators. The refusal by Twitter to correct even blindingly obvious errors of fact and to allow political thugs like Trump as much licence as they did coupled with the abuse and constant attacks by people on those who disagreed with them, made it an easy decision to disengage.
In my view, Liberal should abandon twitter forthwith and allow it to sink into the obscurity it deserves. I read a most revealing piece about the sheer relief that some people have achieved by ending their engagement with social media to be most telling and I think that merely abandoning Twitter in favour of Mastodon is to miss the entire point.
Social media has become a tool for the intolerant and illiberal right and the sooner we Liberal Democrats abandon it, the better.
Mick Taylor: Could not agree more, well said.
A few things about Mastodon:
As it’s a federated network of distinct servers, it is impossible to ban anyone from all of Mastodon.
Different servers have different moderation policies, and make different choices about which other servers to block. Users can block whole servers as well as users.
One has to place a lot of trust in the server admins: a lot of that is necessarily blind.
Some of the design decisions seem to make Mastodon a more pleasant place:
likes/boosts on posts are less obvious, less gamified, than twitter, which may make less motivation for sensationalism
no algorithmic boosts for liked tweets
there are no quote-posts so no performative condemnation and dog piles
lack of full text search (only on usernames and hashtags) is intended to make it harder to search for users to abuse
there’s a content warning (CW) function for sensitive content – by convention this should include politics
500 char limit allows for more in depth commentary than twitter, but not essay writing (that’s what substack and medium are for).
Biggest friction I’ve found so far is following users on other servers. You need to be on your own server to follow, and may need to use the search function to find someone even if you’ve got their page on their server open.
David Allen Green wrote a good post on his experience migrating (he had a locked Twitter account but is enjoying Mastodon more):
https://davidallengreen.com/2022/11/from-twitter-to-mastodon/
There are tools to help migration, e.g.
https://pruvisto.org/debirdify/
This is quite a good overview of Mastodon:
https://github.com/joyeusenoelle/GuideToMastodon/
Finally: adjudicating on Truth is beyond the scope of moderators on any discussion platform. Otherwise they’d be editors.
Back in the days when Paddy was Party leader, he strongly encouraged the use of Cix for conferencing and used to lurk there, only occasionally posting as jjd. That withered after he ceased to be leader. Running a Mastodon server within the Members area of the Federal Party web site would provide a means for internal Party communications away from the public gaze and encourage members to use the web site more. In the days of Cix, many Party members acted as volunteer moderators and this could easily be replicated in Mastodon.
Musk, who is also Tesla CEO, has faced criticism from some groups over his absolutist stance on free speech. They expect his position to increase the volume of misinformation and hate speech on the platform.
His tweet on Monday represented the first time the head of a major social media platform explicitly endorsed a U.S. political party.
Musk directed his Twitter message to what he called “independent-minded voters,” writing: “Shared power curbs the worst excesses of both parties, therefore I recommend voting for a Republican Congress, given that the presidency is Democratic.”
https://worldabcnews.com/musk-who-said-twitter-needed-to-be-politically-neutral-endorses-republicans-in-midterms/