Brian Coleman and road safety: Partingdale Lane update

Last year I blogged about the controversial road safety record of Conservative London Assembly Member Brian Coleman, he also of the exorbitant expense claims. One of the issues I highlighted was Partingdale Lane which had been closed to traffic on safety grounds:

He insisted on opening the road, had to think again after the courts ruled against the policy (with the judge directly criticising Brian Coleman’s behaviour), then saw £250,000 spent on safety measures, even after all that the road sees regular accidents though Brian Coleman claimed that residents had faked a car accident. Oooh, conspiracy. And a big bill. Keeping the road closed would not only have avoided accidents, it would have saved £250,000 on the road works, and it would have saved the extra money spent on the court case, consultations and so on.

Several more months on, how is Brian Coleman’s expensive insistence on reopenning the road looking? Not so good, for as the Hendon Times reports:

A CAR and motorbike crashed in a Mill Hill road beset by controversy this week.

The Honda Jazz and a Suzuki motorbike collided in Partingdale Lane on Monday.

Emergency services were called to the road and paramedics treated minor injuries on the scene.

The accident is the sixth in Partingdale Lane since it was controversially reopened to through traffic.

Meanwhile, he has also come under fire in the local papers for his expense claims:

THE London Assembly’s audit panel has called for stricter guidelines to govern the taxi expenses claimed by members, following the controversy consistently stoked by Brian Coleman.

Navin Shah, the chairman of the panel insisted yesterday that assembly members need to start “practicing what they preach” and suggested more rigorous rules governing taxi expenses.

Mr Shah said: “We do feel extremely unhappy and aggrieved at the level of taxi expenses clocked up by Brian consistently.” …

Mr Coleman said: “I think this is the usual muck-raking nonsense.”

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Geoff Robins 11th Jan '11 - 4:45pm

    To say that these accidents are the fault of the road is nothing short of ridiculous. I use this road almost daily and have never encountered and problems, probably due to the fact that the vast majority of drivers utilising the route do so with due regard for the speed limit and the conditions.

    Dare I say that the biggest gripes are from those that have lost their ‘private’ road?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon Horsman 23rd Sep - 9:51am
    Response to Richard Easter - I feel MOST strongly that the regulations should be enforced
  • User Avatarjames 23rd Sep - 9:50am
    Liberalism is all well and good however the Lib Dems have to learn that it works both ways. Yet then the Lib Dems don't really...
  • User AvatarSimon Horsman 23rd Sep - 9:49am
    I’m pragmatic on this but allowing Uber and others the freedom to function is both liberal and Liberal. BUT does anyone have the facts as...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 23rd Sep - 9:43am
    So how are Uber drivers and vehicles regulated? Or are people expected to get into a Uber taxi knowing nothing whatsoever about the competence and...
  • User AvatarColin Rosenstiel 23rd Sep - 9:43am
    "It is reasonable to have concerns over safety, but to pretend that these concerns should be limited to Uber and not the wider taxi market...
  • User AvatarRichard Easter 23rd Sep - 9:38am
    I see no mention of Uber flouting regulations, with its Greyball software, failing to report criminal offences causing the police to speak out against them,...