The Voice

Clegg: make MPs sell second homes to benefit taxpayer

By | Thu 9th April 2009 - 12:01 am

The Times’s Sam Coates has the story:

MPs should be forced to sell their second homes and return most of the profits to the taxpayer, under plans to be put forward by the Liberal Democrat leader. Nick Clegg moves to outflank both Gordon Brown and David Cameron today with the toughest suggestions to date in the effort to end the damaging row over MPs’ perks and allowances.

Under Mr Clegg’s proposals, to be put forward at a meeting with the Labour and Conservative leaders, MPs would no longer be able to claim mortgage interest payments on expenses and would be compensated only for rental payments. …

Mr Clegg told The Times: “It is easy enough for politicians to talk about how the current system for pay and expenses needs to be changed, but what people want to know is what we are actually going to do about it.”

The Liberal Democrat leader is determined, however, to lay down the principle that MPs should not continue to profit from huge capital gains at the taxpayers’ expense. Research in 2006 by House of Commons authorities found that 485 MPs — three quarters of the total — claimed mortgage interest payments. MPs have benefited considerably from the tripling of property prices since 1997, which have pushed up the average price of a Westminster flat from £171,000 to £543,000 last year. Despite being able to claim more than £20,000 a year for mortgage interest payments, MPs can keep any profit from second home sales when they leave Parliament.

The proposals have not yet been approved by the whole Liberal Democrat parliamentary party, and are likely to be greeted with horror by many MPs.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Andrew Duffield 9th Apr '09 - 11:56am

    Excellent – well done Nick. Not sure why it should only be “most of the profits” though. Why not 100% of the unearned uplift?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Slamdac
    It appears to me that the writer of this article didn't think these people should have gone to prison at all. It would be helpful if they could clarify. My...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Jenny "It’s generally thought that up to 5 miles is a reasonable everyday cycling distance." I don't know how old you are but I'm old, I live in fairly h...
  • Slamdac
    The party doesn't have to be held hostage by anyone. It can have whatever policies it likes, it will then be for the voters to decide who to vote for....
  • Slamdac
    First past the post is good for keeping out Reform and Restore, provided the left/liberals can be disciplined. PR nullifies the effect of tactical voting a...
  • Chloe
    Tristan; I think that's unfair. David has every right to highlight the regional disparity in the party's support and the dangers that leads to. The conditions...