Evan: Labour has dealt serious blow to reform of the monarchy

Even as the Prime Minister was, according to the headlines, proving his commmitment to ‘ending anomaly of royal ban on Catholics’, his Government was conspiring to ‘talk out’ Dr Evan Harris’s private member’s bill reforming the right of succession and the laws preventing the monarch marrying a Catholic. Evan was not amused:

Despite the spin from the Prime Minister about amending religious and sexual discrimination in our constitution being a higher priority, the Government has dealt a serious blow to the prospects of reform by talking out my Bill. Jack Straw was asked three times to provide either a timetable, a commitment to a government Bill before the next election or any other tangible step towards this necessary and popular reform, but said he couldn’t provide any.

“The Liberal Democrats, with cross-party backbench allies, will seek every opportunity to keep this on the agenda.”

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/12954 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Terry Gilbert 27th Mar '09 - 5:17pm

    My own view is that the remaining perogative powers of the monarchy should be abolished first, as a higher priority.

  • I agree, how about an elected head of state then this wouldn’t be an issue????

    We wouldn’t have to get rid of the Queen but when she steps down there shouldn’t be automatic succession for Charles we should have a referendum.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarT-J 18th Dec - 8:05pm
    Shenanigans, yes. But, honestly, at this point? Do we care if the coalition collapses now, or in a few months time when Parliament is dissolved?...
  • User AvatarPeter 18th Dec - 7:46pm
    "Four rounds of consultation over two years, on topics as diverse as fisheries policy and police and criminal justice, have concluded that the current balance...
  • User AvatarBrian Powell 18th Dec - 7:44pm
    I believe the Labour motion only mentioned social tenants because they are the ones who have no way out of this pernicious tax. Social tenants...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 18th Dec - 7:31pm
    refitman 17th Dec '14 - 8:54pm Yes I can imagine the damage Conservatives or Blairites can do over a period longer than 4 or 5...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 18th Dec - 7:24pm
    paul barker 17th Dec '14 - 7:35pm "...Fixed terms ....have certainly hit our Poll ratings uo to now as Voters delay thinking seriously about Politics...
  • User AvatarPeter 18th Dec - 7:00pm
    You mention Russia. Russia regards the former Soviet states along its border as a buffer region between Russia and the West. This is not unreasonable...