Evan: Labour has dealt serious blow to reform of the monarchy

Even as the Prime Minister was, according to the headlines, proving his commmitment to ‘ending anomaly of royal ban on Catholics’, his Government was conspiring to ‘talk out’ Dr Evan Harris’s private member’s bill reforming the right of succession and the laws preventing the monarch marrying a Catholic. Evan was not amused:

Despite the spin from the Prime Minister about amending religious and sexual discrimination in our constitution being a higher priority, the Government has dealt a serious blow to the prospects of reform by talking out my Bill. Jack Straw was asked three times to provide either a timetable, a commitment to a government Bill before the next election or any other tangible step towards this necessary and popular reform, but said he couldn’t provide any.

“The Liberal Democrats, with cross-party backbench allies, will seek every opportunity to keep this on the agenda.”

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Terry Gilbert 27th Mar '09 - 5:17pm

    My own view is that the remaining perogative powers of the monarchy should be abolished first, as a higher priority.

  • I agree, how about an elected head of state then this wouldn’t be an issue????

    We wouldn’t have to get rid of the Queen but when she steps down there shouldn’t be automatic succession for Charles we should have a referendum.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJames Baillie 31st May - 2:53pm
    Peter - I (clearly) disagree, mainly in that I think you're greatly overestimating the extent to which returning to nation-states is a) possible and b)...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 31st May - 2:27pm
    We need to talk to and work with everyone campaigning for a Remain vote, left, right, centre or inside-out. I find interesting the suggestion that...
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 31st May - 2:13pm
    I really don't think Yanis believes what he's saying about a "Different Europe is Possible" except perhaps if its even much worse than the current...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 31st May - 1:45pm
    nvelope 2003 Wrong , the TV licence does not have the status of a tax , it is , morally a dreadful poll tax ,...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 31st May - 1:37pm
    Following the argument in the response , the solution is ownership of property by vastly more people , if we put more thought into actually...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 31st May - 1:30pm
    Very funny article and the Tory party ripping itself to shreds is the only part of the In/Out debate that cheers me up, but even...