A response to the Conference debate on the Balfour Declaration

Shalom alechum, alsalam ealaykum, peace be with you.

Peace, Peace in the land between the river & sea is what we should be working for.

And, to put it mildly, the motion we passed at Conference on Sunday does not do that. Indeed, by passing it, it means we probably won’t get another chance to debate the Palestine/Israel conflict again for some time.

I tried to get the motion referred back to the FPC and to ask them to bring back a better, more comprehensive motion next year as the one we passed today is the lowest common denominator that is acceptable (begrudgingly) to two interest groups in the Party, Lib Dem Friends of Palestine and Lib Dem Friends of Israel.

It does nothing to say what we, as a small political party far away from the area, can do to advance the cause of peace between Palestine & Israel and, believe me, there is much we can do.

We could be learning more from groups like “Solutions not Sides”, we could be inviting speakers from One Voice, YaLa Young Leaders, Ta’ayush and similar organisations, we could be listening to those who work every day to break down the barriers (both physical & mental) between the two nations.

The motion also contains factual errors, for example, line 35 refers to “pre-1967 borders” but no such borders existed as they were Armistice Lines that marked the end of conflict in 1949, they were never meant to be the final demarcation between Israel & its Arab neighbours.

What is worse, all amendments to correct errors and improve the motion have been rejected by FCC. No reason has been given for this rejection.

We need policy that acknowledges the right of both Palestine & Israel to exist as sovereign states within secure recognised borders, a policy that recognises the failures of the current political leadership in both nations to advance the peace process, a policy sets out how we can encourage those working on the ground for peace. Sadly, what we now have is a policy that is incorrect in the details, leaves us open to being called Hamas sympathisers on one hand and appeaser of Israel on the other, doesn’t acknowledge our impotence to influence either the Palestinian Authority or the Government of Israel and that will be condemned by extremists on both sides

We need to move on and develop a progressive policy on how we can encourage the many peace makers in both Palestine and Israel. I would like the FPC to come back next year with a well-researched, options motion that gives Conference real choices and provides us with a genuinely different and defendable line on one of the most important issues in international politics today.

Comments on this post will be pre-moderated.

* Leon Duveen is a Liberal Democrat activist in Worksop, Nottinghamshire

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Lorenzo Cherin 21st Sep '17 - 4:20pm

    If the motion needed more , so do we here.

    For what Leon does not say is just how much he does ,in the direction he advocates, and for ,the situation he understands.

    As he is founder of Liberal Democrats for Peace in the Middle East, which , as he made clear on its foundation ,on here ,to those ,initially, like me and many, keen on what he had to say, exists to provide precisely the way through the extremes and clashes so long heard, this is a chance to promote that better way.

    Whatever the merits of the motion or the amendment from Leon, which , latter , seemed to make real sense , though I was unavailable to get involved and would have wanted to ,a glance at his concerns reveal a rather uncompromising yet , alas , compromised treatment of him , at or pr conference.

    Unlike so many involved in this debate , those who seek solutions , must realise that the support needed is indeed for those beyond power in governments.

    We as Liberals should realise in this , and on many issues, advocacy for a better way, like charity , begins at home.

    And at conference.

  • Chris Burden 21st Sep '17 - 4:38pm

    Amen, Leon

  • Arthur Trussel 21st Sep '17 - 5:50pm

    Hi Leon,
    You say:

    “Peace, Peace in the land between the river & sea is what we should be working for.”

    I have too often heard : “the land from the river to the sea is Israel”.
    Many have been listening to : “We could be learning more from groups like “Solutions not Sides”, for decades.
    I get a very-very strong impression that the Israelis have no intention of giving the Palestinians anything at all; only to continue their demoralising, degrading treatment of them.
    Nothing ever changes and they continue to flout international law.
    I have lived in S/Africa and seen many many films and videos of events in Israel/Palestine- just to say; I would never entertain going to that area, and seeing events makes me question whether the Israelis deserve any land at all.
    I won’t go on, as I could say much more. Just to say I voted against your motion as there will always be someone saying reasons for doing nothing.
    Sorry 🙂
    Clive.

  • As a humanitarian, the human rights situation in the palestinian territories is my major concern. It is all very well for Israel to go on about its right to exist and being under threat. It needs to calm down, seek out and allow Palestine to become an independent state.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarexpats 20th Jan - 1:50pm
    To me Harold Wilson is the man who, despite right wing pressure at home, kept the young men of the UK out of Vietnam. As...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 20th Jan - 1:45pm
    Innocent Bystander, there may be some truth in your assessment of academic economists, but most big investment banks and multi-nationals will have an economics department...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 20th Jan - 1:18pm
    Jimmy Carter presidency was seen as something of a failure. However, much of his best achievements were as an International Statesman, after he was free...
  • User AvatarInnocent Bystander 20th Jan - 1:11pm
    But David, economists only exist to argue unprovable theories with other economists while the rest of us try and make the world function.
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 20th Jan - 12:48pm
    David Raw, I wouldn't put Harold Wilson in the category of Lenin, but his development years during the war were spent as a research assistant...
  • User AvatarInnocent Bystander 20th Jan - 12:44pm
    Obviously a real focal point of love and devotion. To have inspired such admiration and affection over their lifetime, is worthy of praise indeed. I...