Author Archives: Freddie Jewitt

All the homes we will ever need – a permanent fix for the housing crisis

I have a proposal on how to permanently solve the UK’s housing crisis, forever. 

This proposition rests on two arguments:

  1. Unlike all of history, our population is not going to continue to grow. The ONS forecasts that the population of the UK will peak in the early 2040’s at 71m. 
  2. It follows that the number of homes needed will similarly peak.

For maximum economic benefits and happiness, we want these homes to be built where people want to live and work. This is predominantly in the south east, where planning permission is constrained by the Green belt. 

My proposal is that we build on the Green belt. 

The old fear: it’s a slippery slope – grant planning permission for an inch and they will concrete over miles, until all the beauty is gone. 

However, if we accept that peak housing is within our sight, we can slough off this fear, like a hermit crab, and confidently scuttle into our final and forever shell. 

But how much of the Green belt would need to be built on? Worst case: assuming 100% of the homes are wanted in the southeast, ignoring the 100k’s of new homes already in the pipeline, assuming people continue in wanting to live in ever smaller households (2.3 by 2040) and that we decide we want roomier houses and gardens than the legislation currently allows (15 per hectare vs 30). We would need 2,200,000 homes. Rounding up the worse case, that would require building on 10% of the Green belt. Worst case.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 35 Comments

Some Questions for the Federal Party and Leadership

Who are our target voters that will increase our core vote?

What are the challenges they face? What are their hopes and fears? What are the three biggest, most fundamental, most enduring issues they care about enough to vote or change their vote? How do we know we have got beyond face value of what they say to what really influences what they do, in the voting booth?

What is our clear message to them on each issue, based on our values and expressed through our policies? How is that message different to the other parties? Is the message simple enough to …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 25 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    Indeed you are right, Matt.about the need for constant challenge. But reasoned argument is often not listened to: as with the protester against the migrant cros...
  • Michal Simon
    Reform is winning because too much of British politics has spent years telling people not to trust their own eyes. That has to stop. Our advantage as libe...
  • Michal Simon
    Rose is right. Politics is not a dance. It is a fist fight. Often outside the ring, out in the street. Even the Greens have worked that out by now. And if...
  • Neil Sandison
    Very good article education and skills training used to be one of our strong points .time to start listening and delivering for those left behind by the other p...
  • Chris Moore
    @Tristan Ward: The London LDs and the Camden party need to send their own calls for help to all other local parties in London and all the local parties in th...