Author Archives: Jim Roland

Subscribe

1. Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
2. Like us on Facebook
3. Subscribe to our feed
4. Sign-up for our daily email digest

Most Read

1. The Lib Dems should be bolder. Here’s how....
2. You don't need to be a hero to fight fascism
3. Jane Dodds to step down as Welsh Lib Dem Leader
4. Vince Cable writes: The endless hunt for painless taxes
5. Before we talk about coalition, we must ask: What are the Liberal Democrats for?

Search

Op-eds

• London’s football pitch crisis is freezing out disabled children. We must stop treating inclusion as a charity luxury (Jean-François Burford)
• Is kindness what we stand for? (Josh Matthews)
• Don’t take Democracy for granted (Lord William Wallace)
• Britain’s gas gamble: Why Jackdaw is a bad bet for our energy future (Mark Hofman)
• Vince Cable writes: The endless hunt for painless taxes (Vince Cable)

• The Joy of Six 1596
• Southwell Minster faces building repair bill of £20m
• Latest voting intention and leadership ratings opinion polls
• United Nations Day, 24th October
• The church and the lifeboat memorial
• Bob Trubshaw revisits the Ironstone quarries of Leicestershire
• Ex-Conservative campaign director sentenced over election bets
• The Burnham government: the shine dims.
• This week, it's the Conservatives who prosper in by-elections
• A.E. Housman on books and their authors

Recent Comments

• PM
  "the general public perception that somehow the BoE Base Rate is linked to the cost of borrowing" This is because it is. The banks can always ...
• Pawel Urbanski
  Jana - I like it. It is addressing the issue practically. The pitch is never empty and the operator loses nothing. The harder part comes later. Rules, even cont...
• cim
  The constitutional preamble has two big problems with it as a statement of "what the Lib Dems are for" 1) As a statement of principle it doesn't distinguish ...
• Jason Connor
  I think it's really disappointing to see another poster call those who disagree with them a numpty. That kind of patronising insult devalues their argument. The...
• David Evans
  No! What are you thinking about?...