Author Archives: Martin Gill

Opinion: Traditional media is not all we should be looking at

It’s not often I agree with a Conservative MP, it’s even less often that I hear them say something that actually strikes me as truly insightful.

During the parliamentary debate on the BSkyB bid there was one such moment. At 6.25pm Dr Phillip Lee stood up and spoke to a now mostly empty chamber. This was a shame, because what he had to say was, in my view, extremely relevant and highly important. (Hansard)

He spoke on the fact that a lot, if not the vast majority, of the news people are getting today comes from not the mainstream media, the …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , , , , and | 5 Comments

Opinion: Vote one thing, get another

I keep hearing all these concerns about having voted for one thing (e.g. LibDems) getting another (e.g. Tory). It seems to be the only thing disaffected party members can think of saying (at least those the media has been lining up for us, tearing up membership cards in front of the NEC).

I wish the people spouting all of this would take a step back and realise just how silly they sound. I’ve voted LibDem since I could vote; three different governments, one Conservative, two Labour were the result. I voted LibDem and I got Tory, then I got Labour, …

Posted in Op-eds | 42 Comments

Opinion: Choosing our Judges

Yesterday’s Guardian front page was plastered with images of white, male, privately educated, High Court judges selected for the bench, even after the introduction of new diversity measures.

The paper bemoans the lack of diversity, where are the women, the ethnic minorities? Let’s consider something radical here; could it be that those men are actually the best for the job, regardless of ethnicity?

Just because a judge might be a white male doesn’t mean he cannot have an appreciation of issues and views of minorities or of women; there are people he can ask for this information, and surely the most important thing for a high court judge is to know the letter and the spirit of the law and how to apply it? If everyone is supposed to be treated fairly and equally under the law, then a white-male, ethnic, religious or gender perspective should have no actual bearing on it? I accept that our world isn’t perfect and while we ought to strive for such a system we will never achieve it, yet if we need a white, black, male or female judge because each would apply the law differently, then haven’t we’ve discovered a flaw in our system that needs to be fixed?

Posted in Op-eds | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHelen Dudden 17th Nov - 1:10pm
    Freebies for all plus, the disarray of the Party, won't. Brexit Done, well at least it sounds positive, in the fact we can have democracy....
  • User AvatarGlenn 17th Nov - 12:40pm
    Peter Martin The energy suppliers are pretty much just billing services and barely even that as most of the actual meter reading is farmed out...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 17th Nov - 12:13pm
    Pursuing a legal challenge is sensible. Making it the big campaign issue to talk to the public about is not. Johnson has "Get Brexit Done"....
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 17th Nov - 12:07pm
    In case Alex Macfie or anyone else is remotely interested in facts - The evidence from pollsters is that, when the Lib Dems do not...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 17th Nov - 12:03pm
    "You can see the full results including all the STV tables here." Is not working for me.
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 17th Nov - 11:46am
    David Allen, yes I would go for equidistance from Hitler and Stalin. That's "from", not "between". They are much much closer to each other than...