There’s been a lot of noise recently about applying international law. What exactly does this mean? Statutes on human rights were formalised as international law following the atrocities committed during the Holocaust in which at least twelve million were killed, six million of them Jews.
But over the years these laws have seemingly been applied indiscriminately with Western powers left off the hook time and again. Questions around British and American actions in places like Iraq linger, but in recent years the heat has been turned up. Israel, traditional ally to many Western powers, has been the subject of case after case brought to the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice. Judgements to date include a decision that Israeli occupation of the West Bank is illegal under international law, and Israel has been warned that accusations of genocide in Gaza are plausible and the ICC is adjudicating this case.
As Israel’s allies defend the actions of the Israeli government, international law is again being scrutinised. What’s it for? I’d have hoped that would be obvious – it’s designed to prevent world atrocities and to adjudicate a world in which we can all thrive, but this only works if everybody and every country are held to the same standards and here lies the problem. Rather than admit wrongdoing, countries like the US and Israel are doing their best to undermine the validity of international law by decrying the international courts. Shocking when you consider that the US led in creating statutes on human rights because of what had happened to victims of the Nazi regime, many of whom migrated to Palestine then Israel.
So as a Jew, descended from 1200+ years of famous Rabbis and Jewish community leaders, including a number of Britain’s earliest chief rabbis, I was particularly driven to find out how we have arrived at this juncture. Pew Research did a poll in Spring 2024 which revealed that 73% of Jewish Israelis felt Israel’s response to October 7th was proportionate or not strong enough. By then tens of thousands of Gazan civilians had died. As a Jew and a filmmaker I wanted to find out where this popular opinion had come from. I went to Israel to film with the hypothesis that the results of this poll were a combination of unresolved Jewish trauma, and current-day Israeli politics. What I found gave me sleepless nights.
Political psychologist Daniel Bar-Tal, eminence gris in his field, talked me through what he described as ‘The Culture of Conflict’ in which history and education were optimised for militarisation. Media analyst Ayala Panievsky described the results of decades of a dedicated strategic push by the settler movement to dominate Israeli politics and the media, and Rabbi Avi Dabush discussed the clash in Israel between liberal Westernised Jewish values and the nationalism of religious Zionism. Other interviewees filled in gaps and people in the streets provided popular opinion. The result was my film Planet Israel, which is just winding down its UK cinema release and will now be open for community and educational screenings.
I no longer practice Judaism, so I surprised myself by coming away feeling angry on behalf of my ancestors who have kept Jews and Judaism safe for over a thousand years and across at least three continents. How could we have come to a place where militaristic nationalism seems to have over-ridden the moral pillar that to me lies at the heart of Judaism? I see this as an existential race to save the values of Judaism against the type of vandalism that Judaism has already seen off several times in its history (eg. the Sicarii movement). But it’s also a clarion cry to the wider world.
It is now even more urgent than ever that our system of international law is underpinned, and given the power to ensure that these laws are implemented and that everyone is equal under these laws. In order to do this, we need to do the unthinkable and re-assess our allies, not on the basis of whether they are traditional or convenient bedfellows, or a necessity under realpolitik, but on whether their values are compatible with our own. Too many of us are feeling the foundations of our democracies crumbling, but applying one rule for everybody will surely improve this.
* Gillian Mosely is a multi-award-winning documentary maker and is descended from early leading British rabbis including Haham Raphael Meldola and David Aaron De Sola. Her new film Planet Israel will soon be available for community and education screenings via www.planetisrael.co.uk. She is a member of the Lib Dems in Camden.



11 Comments
This is written with courage and from the heart. Thank you.
Well said Gillian.
Lib Dems should be shouting from the rooftops about upholding international law (and humanity) in Israel-Palestine but are shamefully prone to caution and ‘both-siding’ when it comes to speaking out on the ongoing atrocities.
Thank-you for this piece, Gillian.
This film, Planet Israel, is a fascinating watch. If you have the opportunity, please arrange a showing.
Judi Conner is absolutely right. My belief was that human rights were the core of Lib Dem policy. I find it shocking that hardly any Lib Dem Cllrs have signed the pledge for Palestine. My Cllrs said it was because the pledge asks for divestment from pensions and this is virtually impossible now that pension funds are pooled. I pointed out that pledge states in first para “action where applicable” but it had no effect, sending message that lib dems do not care or have no policy on Palestine. Supporters voted tactically for us at last election but are switching to Greens.
I’m really thankful for this article and for the courage to approach such a subject with honesty, reflection and humanity. It’s important because it reminds us all that international law and human rights must be universal and not applied selectively. We need more space for thoughtful conversations like this, where people are willing to question, listen and challenge assumptions. Bravo Gillian
Powerfully put. Still alot of people need reminding that calling for a ceasefire calling for a solid 2 state solution where peace prevails the agony of war doesnt make you anti semitic it makes you a human being because your simply saying no more to the decimation of innocent lives of men women and children
,
Powerfully put. Still alot of people need reminding that calling for a ceasefire calling for a solid 2 state solution where peace prevails the agony of war doesnt mke you anti semitic it makes you a human being because your simply saying no more to the decimation of innocent lives of men women and children
An excellent article, and fantastic investigative research which exposes the western bias of international law that has become so apparent in recent times. I look forward to watching Planet Israel when I have the opportunity.
Gillian Mosley has the strong morals and values of her ancestors running through her veins and she has the heart and soul to share them with us through her professional work, friendship and humanity. As Chair of LDFP I highly recommend Planet Israel, and LDFP were very honoured to have Gillian as one of our 4 outstanding guest speakers on our fringe event panel at Brighton Conference last month.
Thank you Gillian for a well argued piece on Palestine which also illuminates other underlying but often overlooked issues. One of the core issues for liberals, capital or small l, must surely be what are we liberals DOING – and not just saying – in the face of this Israeli genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity? And what our elected leaders doing and are we liberals holding them to account. Challenges which are vividly described in Omar El Akkad’s book, perfectly summarised in its title – ‘One day …everyone will have been against this’. Gillian reminds us we have an obligation not to simply wait for that day.