[email protected]: Tim Leunig – Co-ordinated inflation could bail us all out

Over at the Financial Times, Tim Leunig – occasional contributor to LDV, and reader in economics at the London School of Economics – considers the unusual financial origins of the current recession. Here’s an excerpt:

The global economy would benefit from a pre-announced, temporary, globally co-ordinated bout of moderate inflation. Since it takes about two years for central-bank policy fully to influence inflation, a sensible policy would be to target 4 per cent inflation for the five years from 2011, followed by 2 per cent thereafter. … An increase in inflation by an extra 2 percentage points for a period of five years would have many benefits – for governments, companies, households and the banking system. …

An extra 2 points of inflation for five years is not a “get out of jail free card”. Bank shareholders, rightly, will still lose greatly from their managers’ decisions. Future taxpayers will, inevitably, still bear most of the cost of counter-cyclical government spending. … The policy aims to improve the health of the banking system so growth can resume, while dividing the cost of paying for the mistakes of the past more equitably.

We can go too far. Inflation much above 4 per cent risks starting an inflationary spiral. Higher inflation for too long risks creating permanently higher expectations and stoking future booms. In addition, savers should not pay a disproportionate share of the cost of this recession. Advocating a policy that cannot be guaranteed to work, and that is neither costless nor riskless, is not usually sensible. It is a measure of the unusualness of this recession that such an idea is worth considering.

You can read the article in full at the FT’s website by clicking here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Can central banks target inflation that accurately? The Bank of England had missed its targets by 2% a few months ago.

  • Andrew Duffield 16th Feb '09 - 8:00am

    Sounds like you may be another convert to quantative easing Tim. Excellent news if so!

    Cutting interest rates is an utter waste of time when the problem all along has been the shortage of money in the economy. If that new money is free of interest bearing debt rather than borrowed, runaway inflation risks will actually be lower and government will be able to start managing the economy rather than the banks.

  • David Evans 16th Feb '09 - 2:04pm

    I agree with Mark. Those on fixed incomes (a large proportion of whom are old) will bail out the bankers, the government and the economists. It may be inevitable, but it is not a neat idea, simply a way of disguising failure and passing it on to those who will make the least fuss.

  • Is that the same Andrew Duffield that used to be a neighbour of mine late 90s/early 00s?

    If so, hello. Hope you’re well.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • David Evans
    I think Boris Johnson has shredded trust in *Conservative* politicians. We have to prove (and in general we do prove) we are much better than that - Not lying;...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Mick Taylor Definitely saw Ed being interviewed late morning I think it was....
  • David Evans
    Absolutely Nigel. Essentially Liberalism is about enabling people as far as is possible to make the best of themselves. It is not about giving liberties to ...
  • David Evans
    Well said Mick - I particularly like the clear link you have made to the Scottish Problem which offers a real positive way forward....
  • Joseph Bourke
    When things get tough, public support for more generous welfare provision funded by higher taxes tends to wane. William is right in pointing to the need for emp...