Daily View 2×2: 12 February 2010

Friday already! And only twelve Action Weekends away from the General Election (we’re guessing)…

2 Must-Read Blog Posts

What are other Liberal Democrat bloggers saying? Here are two posts that caught my eye from the Liberal Democrat Blogs aggregator:

  • Electoral marathon
  • Emma Bagley is pacing (and bracing) herself for the next twelve weeks.

  • Another one bites the dust
  • Andy Crick of Wit and Wisdom changes gear (and blog) for the campaign ahead.


Spotted any other great posts in the last day from blogs that aren’t on the aggregator? Do post up a comment sharing them with us all.

2 Big Stories

Lib Dems win campaign for advance notice of electricity & gas price changes

Energy companies will have to inform customers before they change their prices, after the Government backed down on Liberal Democrat plans to amend the Energy Bill currently before Parliament.

Having previously rejected proposals from the Liberal Democrats, ministers today published their own amendment that would end rules allowing energy companies to wait 65 days before notifying customers of price changes.

The amendment was tabled as the Bill moves towards the end of its passage before the House of Commons. [From www.libdems.org.uk]

Blunder on DNA defence by Home Office

David Hanson, the policing minister, has been criticised for repeating a case study to MPs as part of a series of examples of why retention of DNA samples of innocent people helps solve crimes.

Proposals in the Crime and Security Bill, currently going through parliament, would see the profiles of innocent people retained on the national DNA database for up to six years.

Hanson wrote to the MPs on the Bill’s parliamentary committee with a list of five examples of where someone had their DNA taken but was not charged and were later caught for far more serious offences because samples taken from the later crime matched them on the database.

But it emerged two of the examples were the same case. [Telegraph]

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Daily View.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Blake
    Well worth subscribing....
  • David Blake
    I've never thought of us as a low tax party. If we need to do something and it requires additional taxation, then a higher tax is one of the ways to do it. I ...
  • Roland
    But what are "low taxes" other than just a sound-bite? With hindsight we can see focusing on "low-taxes" - like the tories have for many decades, has only re...
  • nigel hunter
    We cannot fund the needs of the people and country if we are a low tax party....
  • Jonathan Calder
    Do we want to be a low-tax party? It seems the leadership wants to fight the next election on that basis, but I detect no great enthusiasm for the idea among th...