Dominic Grieve’s amendment saves us from an uncomfortable Christmas

Embed from Getty Images

Amongst last Tuesday’s excitement of Theresa May attempting a “Charles the First”, it was easy to miss the significance of Dominic Grieve’s Brexit amendment:
With the government seemingly heading towards a defeat for May’s deal, there was concern that in such a scenario, there would be a bit of an impasse, with the government in the driving seat. Grieve’s amendment means that Parliament will have the power to say what happens next. As the Guardian explains:

Under the terms of the EU Withdrawal Act, the government will have 21 days to come back to parliament with a motion, setting out what it plans to do.

Grieve’s amendment, which is backed by the shadow Brexit secretary, Sir Keir Starmer, is aimed at ensuring any such motion can be amended by MPs.

They hope this will allow parliament to express its support for alternative approaches – and prevent the government either hurtling towards a no-deal Brexit without the backing of MPs, or imposing a plan B of its own devising.

A proviso should be stated. As the Clerk of the House of Commons recently clarified, only laws passed by Parliament have to be followed by the government. Motions do not have to be followed by the government.

That said, it is a relief that there is more of process in the event of May’s deal failing in Parliament. As Rafael Behr wrote in the Guardian, the amendment:

…reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of Britain leaping off the Brexit cliff without a parachute.

Dominic Grieve’s amendment was backed by an interesting assortment of Conservative MPs, such as Sir Nicholas Soames, Richard Benyon, Oliver Letwin, Damian Green and Michael Fallon. They are far from being “the normal suspects”.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. He is one of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • David Becket 8th Dec '18 - 1:04pm

    Where was a Lib Dem supporter? AWOL!!

  • Yeovil Yokel 8th Dec '18 - 3:14pm

    Thanks for posting that list, Paul, all 12 Lib Dem MPs’ names are there.

  • Glad to note that our MPs all voted in the ‘Ayes’ Lobby (even Stephen Lloyd on this occasion!) – but why is there not a single Lib Dem on the list of the amendment’s proposers when this does include not only Conservative and Labour MPs, but also SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green members?

    If we are serious about helping to secure a People’s Vote/further referendum, then our MPs need to work with others on a properly coordinated cross-party basis in order to use any parliamentary opportunities that may be open to us. The issues at stake are too important for narrow party politics.

  • Yeovil Yokel 8th Dec '18 - 6:22pm

    I’ve recently discovered a fondness for lawyers.

  • Peter Hirst 10th Dec '18 - 3:07pm

    If parliament now dictates what happens, we have to trust it and that leaves everything in the air though better than the government in control. It all goes for a hasty decision and I’m against that. We need time for reflection, further negotiation and another referendum. And it’s Christmas.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSean Hagan 21st Jan - 8:43pm
    @Andrew Houseley - you make an interesting observation about the challenge posed by decentralisation to “mercantile buccaneering capitalism”. Perhaps this helps to explain the obvious...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Jan - 8:10pm
    David Raw, I seem to recall the Liberal Party under Jeremy Thorpe did rather well in the February 1974 General election, drawing quite a bit...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 21st Jan - 7:45pm
    @ JoeB, It isn't explained. It's just more assertion. A point that strikes me is that may be that 80% is produced in the private...
  • User AvatarMartin 21st Jan - 7:33pm
    David Raw: Isn't it predictive fingers rather than predictive text? - At least you picked it up. I had the same, sinking heart reaction when...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st Jan - 7:20pm
    The last time there was a February election was, I think, in 1974. As now, the Heath Government was in a pickle and ran on...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 21st Jan - 6:56pm
    There is no way that we can control the debate in a General Election, it would be the usual confused mess & we & Brexit...