Enjoy Europe Day? Churchill would have done

Last Wednesday, 9 May, was Europe Day.  If celebration of this day here in Britain passed you by then you might enjoy Winston Churchill’s Zurich Speech in 1946, calling for a United States of Europe.

You can read the full text here and can listen to the former Liberal Home Secretary delivering the speech in two parts here and here.

Council of Europe

Churchill (right) with Adenauer, Spaak, Bevin, Schuman and de Gasperi as members of the Council of Europe

In this seminal speech, Churchill said,

“If Europe were once united in the sharing of its common inheritance, there would be no limit to the happiness, to the prosperity and glory which its three or four hundred million people would enjoy.”

He called for a “sovereign remedy” to Europe’s troubled past and said,

“What is this sovereign remedy?

It is to re-create the European Family, or as much of it as we can, and provide it with a structure under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and in freedom.

We must build a kind of United States of Europe.”

As a half-American, who had travelled extensively in the place he referred to as “the Great Republic” and having imagined that in slightly different circumstances he might have been a Congressman rather than an MP, Churchill would probably have had a clear idea about the constitutional structure implied by “United States”.

In case there is any doubt as to whether Churchill imagined British participation in the project, he said,

“The first step is to form a Council of Europe.”

Three years later in Strasbourg, Churchill spoke as a member of the Council of Europe:

“We are meeting here in this new Assembly not as representatives of our different countries or different political parties but as Europeans marching forward.”

The Strasbourg speech (full text here) was as influential as Zurich in leading to 9 May 1950, the first Europe Day, when Robert Schuman announced a plan to create a Coal and Steel Community, leading to the European Economic Community in 1957.

I think our school children should learn more about Winston Churchill.  I am sure all the newspapers would agree.

* Antony Hook was a Liberal Democrat MEP for South East England (2019) and has practised as a barrister since 2003. He is currently Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group on Kent County Council.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.


  • SSSHHHHhhhhh don’t let the Tories hear you telling the inconvenient truth that Churchill was pro European…

  • Churchill never intended Britain to be part of his United States of Europe because he thought the Commonwealth was going to be much more central to Britain’s future economy and foreign policy.

    Unfortunately for modern europhobes, the Commonwealth idea is one that is forty years out of date as a bloc of nations with Britain providing the economic engine, and forty years too soon as a bloc of nations around India’s economy.

    And of course there’s the issue of whether said europhobes would be any happier cooperating on equal terms with India et al than they currently are with France, Germany and friends.

  • This is all interesting stuff to one who failed History at school. Perhaps more interesting than what he actually said (or meant) then, would be a projection of what he might be saying were he around today.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • John Grout
    We should not be surprised that people who are the subjects of a debate want to be part of it - it’s also not unsurprising that they won’t want to debate, p...
  • Andrew Melmoth
    @Simon McGrath But that's not the whole story. The government can set the redistribution rules in an effort to tilt the system in their favour. For instance ...
  • Matt McLaren
    Thanks for your thoughts Richard. As you say, others will make their own judgements about what is said above. I'm very keen to work with others to improve th...
  • Simon McGrath
    Some interesting points here but redrawing constituency boundary are done by an independent body - nothing to do with the Govt...
  • Brad Barrows
    Surely we do not judge the strength of a democracy by the people that voters choose to elect or the policies being proposed by successful candidates.......