Is the SNP’s latest European Election Broadcast even legal?

imageLast week, the SNP’s first broadcast for the European Elections was broadcast. It bore a remarkable similarity to the broadcasts that they have been putting out since the end of last year which were all aimed at persuading people to vote Yes in the independence referendum. It interspersed colourful footage of children talking about how wonderful and independent Scotland with black and white starkness portraying a vision of hellish Westminster rule.

George Lyon, Scotland’s Liberal Democrat MEP questioned why they would put out a broadcast which, in a 420 word script, mentioned independence 4 times and Europe, er, not even once. It wasn’t even hinted at. He said:

Alex Salmond is happy to talk about Scotland when he is in Europe but he does not seem to want to talk about Europe when he is in Scotland. I am sure that those who watched the broadcast for the EU elections will be puzzled about why the SNP can’t bring themselves to stop talking about independence and start talking about Europe.

Whether we are talking about the Scottish jobs our place in the EU supports, the environment or fighting cross-border crime it is clear we can achieve more when we work together. That is why Liberal Democrats are making the positive case for Scotland remaining in Britain and in Europe.

Party broadcasts are the traditional way for parties to set out their stall ahead of elections. With polling day at the European Elections less than one month away, the missing word from the SNP’s broadcast was ‘Europe’.

But I’m wondering if George hasn’t missed something here. Political broadcasts are strictly regulated here. The main parties get 3 each for the European elections and there will be a different allocation for the independence referendum later this year. By doing a referendum broadcast in the European elections, are they not giving themselves another bite at the cherry.

Let’s see what the Ofcom guidance on Party Political Broadcasts has to say. Well, section 18 is pretty unequivocal.

The purpose of a PEB must not be to promote any particular outcome of a referendum.

A direct quote from the broadcast:

When 18th September arrives, please vote yes for Scotland, for yourself and for your children’s future.

I’d say the evidence that this does not comply with Ofcom’s guidance is pretty clear. I wonder what the Electoral Commission would have to say about it.

Now, the SNP’s main focus is on independence. Of course it is. It’s who they are. I don’t have an issue with that. I do, however, have a problem with them not playing by the rules. They’ve effectively given themselves a extra bite at the referendum cherry. The imbalance needs to be redressed.

 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Toby Fenwick 29th Apr '14 - 2:14pm

    Good for you, Caron – how do you take it up with the Electoral Commission?

  • Toby – I think it’s OFCOM who will have to decide, then the Electoral Commission will have to investigate?

  • peter tyzack 30th Apr '14 - 9:08am

    the media are in control, they want a fragmented UK and a Little England floating off from Europe into the cold north Atlantic.. at least that is what they seem to be working towards. Farage and Salmond are just pawns in their game..

  • Not only is the SNP PEB not legal, but they also use One Great Thing as their theme song – a song written by two people born in England!

  • Thomas Robinson 3rd May '14 - 3:18pm

    I take it you are far more afraid of the SNP than Labour who also focussed on the Referendum with multiple uses of the word “Together”.

    I am afraid George Lyons is about to suffer a double defeat at the hands of the SNP-he lost his MSP seat to them in 2007 and I would say he will loose his MEP seat to them this month. He will certainly lose it to someone.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 16th Sep - 6:24pm
    Alex Macfie. I do understand it. I just don't think it is principled or defensible. Anyway, I'm not going backwards and forwards on this, because...
  • User Avatarfrankie 16th Sep - 6:13pm
    Bless, Peter just explain to us how Zimbabwe and Argentina got into the mess they did as both can print their own currency. I'll give...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 16th Sep - 6:04pm
    Teejay: Your faith in the Brexit Party's ability to mobilize support is touching, but you forget that Remain voters are at least as mobilized as...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 16th Sep - 5:57pm
    Revoke is now our Policy (unless there is a Referendum before the next Election) backed overwhelmingly by Conference & our Current Leadership. We need to...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 16th Sep - 5:43pm
    There are only 2 possible routes to Electoral Reform; a LibDem-dominated Government or a wholesale Realignement of the present House of Commons with the Centrist...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 16th Sep - 5:29pm
    Glenn: You completely misunderstand what "representative" means in the context of representative democracy. The relationship between an MP and a constituent is not equivalent to...
Thu 10th Oct 2019