Just as US President Jimmy Carter was the antidote to “Tricky Dicky”, could Oprah Winfrey save the world from Trump?

This is the eleventh of my posts based on a recent tour of the eastern half of the USA. I visited a number of sites relevant to African American history. To mark Black History Month, I am relating some of the things I saw, in the order I saw them.

I had the great pleasure of visiting the Jimmy Carter Presidential Library and Museum in Atlanta, Georgia. It is set just outside the city centre, in very leafy and peaceful surroundings. The exhibition gave me a sense of a great man, shaped by his upbringing in Georgia, his experience as a farmer and businessman, and his service in the US Navy in nuclear submarines.

I was interested in Jimmy Carter’s upbringing. As you can see from my photo above, most of his boyhood friends in rural Georgia were black.

These friendships gave him an acute sense of the injustice of racial segregation. He was drawn into politics, originally, by a resultant passion to fight segregation. Wikipedia relates:

Racial tension was inflamed in Plains (Georgia) by the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court’s anti-segregation ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. Carter was in favour of racial tolerance and integration — at one point, the local White Citizens’ Council boycotted his peanut warehouse when he refused to join them — but he often kept those feelings to himself to avoid making enemies. By 1961 he was a prominent member of the community and the Baptist Church as well as chairman of the Sumter County school board, where he began to speak more loudly in favour of school integration.

Jimmy Carter won the presidency when people were still shocked by Nixon and Watergate. He emerged as a “whiter than white” candidate from the deep South, untainted by Washington DC, with a boyish smile. The perfect antidote to “Tricky Dicky” Nixon. Interestingly, if anyone manages to beat Trump in 2020 it may be someone like Jimmy Carter – someone completely out of the normal box. Someone like Oprah Winfrey.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA.


  • Paul,
    Maybe Oprah but the US system is fuelled by money and does that mean Mark Zuckerberg?!
    My 100/1 outsider would be Tulsi Gabbard. Lovely speaker, very clear and ex armed forces but I don’t suppose she could raise the dosh needed to unseat the current uber rich incumbent (but I would lend her a tenner if she could).

  • Lorenzo Cherin 11th Oct '17 - 2:25pm

    Wow, Paul, you went to such interesting places, it seems either it was a long trip or you love travelling from place to place and have some , huge energy!

    Were you flying to each, driving or taking the train ?

    Carter is one of the finest men to ever be president , far better in the role than many despite the failings , of which every one of them was rarely of his making.

    He was and is the most constructive ex president, literally , building houses for Habitat for Humanity ! His work with his Carter Centre, supported and joined by his terrific wife Rosylyn, is what actually won him the Nobel prize for peace .

    I agree with Ian, his journey to the White House was a long , consistent and strong record of stability and service, getting to the top job in middle age. Presidential candidates need to have some or more of that.

    Obama would have been better later, on, as would the stars of today, emerging , as palehorse says of the gorgeous possibility of a Tulsi Gabbard presidency ! Too soon, perhaps, too much charisma ,letting us think she is ready for such a task, when compared to political nouse. She is more than an attractive prospect, yet , I cannot help think , that peaking too early as not a good way to go about such things.But , her record of service is exemplary.

    As for Oprah Winfrey, she never even weighed in on political issues directly until Obama became a candidate. I am not sure she would have the political or electoral grasp , though so obvious a choice for any big role involving leadership, but perhaps not political power. After this presidency though , happily , either of these mentioned or anyone decent !

  • Little Jackie Paper 11th Oct '17 - 10:31pm

    From wikipedia on Donald Trump’s 2000 campaign – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign,_2000

    ‘Trump focused his campaign on the issues of fair trade, eliminating the national debt, and achieving universal healthcare as outlined in the campaign companion piece The America We Deserve, released in January 2000. He named media proprietor Oprah Winfrey as his ideal running mate’

  • Richard Underhill 28th Sep '18 - 4:38pm

    A vacancy on the US Supreme Court was a major issue in the US Presidential election. President Obama had made a nomination to fill the vacancy, but as the White House website reported, the Republican majority in the Senate refused to hold hearings to advise the President. Not doing their job was unprecedented. They managed to delay until after the Presidential election. Donald Trump was elected as President. He made a different nomination. Hearings are happening now. Republican senators are complaining about delays, alleging that asking for an FBI investigation is just a delaying tactic on what they call partisan lines, we might use the word tribal.
    We might consider using the word hypocritical. If we do we side with the victim of an alleged sexual assault against the alleged perpetrator. Dr. Ford is a credible witness. Judge Kavanaugh refused to answer specific questions put to him by Senators.

  • Richard Underhill 6th Oct '18 - 11:44am

    World news on BBC tv showed a speech by US Senator Collins. When it ended the BBC newscaster gave her opinion that this was “a masterclass”.
    Senator Collins gave her experience in previous nominations to the Supreme Court by Republican and Democratic Presidents including republican G H W Bush (George Bush senior) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush
    and Democrats, Bill Clinton and Barack H. Obama. She had interviewed the current nominee Brett Kavanaugh twice, the second time by telephone.
    She defended Democrat Senator Feinstein against allegations of allegedly leaking a confidential document from complainant Dr. Ford
    Senator Collins ended by stating that she would vote in favour of the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh when the Senate takes its final vote.
    It is possible that another Senator will be paired, because of a wedding.
    If sainthood is available to Southern Baptists I would like to nominate Sunday School teacher Jimmy Carter. I would not nominate Donald Trump.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • David Langshaw
    Just to add to the Singapore imagery, it's worth remembering that the Japanese advanced all the way down the Malayan peninsula on bicycles....
  • Geoff Reid
    In the midst of the alarms and excursions of an election campaign - and the necessary simplifications - it is very refreshing to be reminded of the ground on wh...
  • Bill Le Breton
    Fantastic piece. Thank you....
  • Neil Hickman
    Sadly, Martin, I fear you’re right. Labour apparatchiks would far rather a monopoly Labour government than one dependent on the Lib Dem’s (and kept honest ...
  • Martin Gray
    If Labour - as predicted win by a landslide I can't see a change in the voting system anytime soon. PCC and local elections have a poor turnout - no amount of a...