Just when you thought the Home Office couldn’t get any worse..

…a story in the Sunday Times (£) today tells how details from a suicidal young girl’s medical notes were used to deny her family asylum. And what’s worse, an immigration judge found in favour of the Home Office and the family faces deportation.

The girl, who lives in the northeast and cannot be named, had been given a “sugar-coated” version of why her family had to flee Albania for a new life in Britain. Her father did not tell the child about an alleged assassination attempt on his life by the local mafia.

At an interview with a psychiatric nurse, 48 hours after the girl overdosed in 2016, the child said her family came to Britain to “have access to better healthcare for dad”.

The Home Office was assessing the family’s asylum application at the time and learnt that the girl was “experiencing medical issues”. It requested access to her records for “safeguarding” purposes. But officials found the nurse’s psychiatric assessment and, in an unprecedented step, used it to argue that her father was lying about his reasons for coming to the UK.

If you are in a vulnerable situation, you need to know that you can talk openly to those giving you care in confidence. Of course parents aren’t going to burden their children with dangerous realities if they can avoid it, particularly if they have reason to be worried about a child’s mental state.

The Home Office doesn’t have too many bottoms of barrels left to scrape but this is yet another example of why it is not fit for purpose and should be dismantled and rebuilt with dignity, respect and fairness at the heart of its culture.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Suzanne Fletcher 15th Apr '19 - 10:10am

    As Caron says “The Home Office doesn’t have too many bottoms of barrels left to scrape”. I have just this minute finished the Liberal Democrats for Seekers of Sanctuary April Newsletter, the last one was 4th March. The April newsletter has articles about FOUR instances of the Home Office being found guilty in the High Court. that is just in 6 weeks.
    The policy document there was huge controversy about at our September conference last year has detailed and radical proposals about reforming the present roles of the Home Office, and we need to keep on pressing on those.
    Our first para reads
    “As well as many well researched reports revealing Home Office shortcomings in how it deals with those seeking sanctuary, there are as many as FOUR court cases reported in this newsletter where the Home Office has been found to be dealing with a situation wrongly by the High Court. Surely this is a strong message that the Home Office is not fit for purpose. It needs radical reform as outlined in Lib Dem policy, and a swift end to the Hostile Environment.”
    I’ll now see if I can get hold of the full article behind the paywall, please ?

  • Suzanne Fletcher 15th Apr '19 - 2:30pm

    Having now read the full article, it strikes me that the Home Office comment is about “controlling immigration”. NO it is not about that, it is about establishing a claim for asylum.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarWilliam Fowler 16th Jun - 9:10am
    Surely Boris's ability to twist and turn, not really mean what he says, and use his charisma to get out of trouble is just what...
  • User AvatarThomas 16th Jun - 9:02am
    Peter Martin, Michael BG - how about? M-X = -3 and T-G = 1 then S-I = 2? Or: M-X =-2 and T-G =0 then...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 16th Jun - 8:50am
    "I did not disagree with the need to reduce the public sector deficit and debt " That's 'cos of his neoliberal tendencies! If anyone wants...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 16th Jun - 8:34am
    Recently, in our local area police have been trialling facial recognition and, in at least one case, getting high-handed with someone who shielded his face...
  • User AvatarDenis Loretto 16th Jun - 8:09am
    As has already been said in this thread there is no such thing as people moulded into separate distinct cadres suitable only for specific political...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 16th Jun - 6:44am
    @ JoeB, "In an open economy, national saving is the sum of private savings, the public saving, and net capital inflows" Ok so what does...