Just when you thought the Home Office couldn’t get any worse..

…a story in the Sunday Times (£) today tells how details from a suicidal young girl’s medical notes were used to deny her family asylum. And what’s worse, an immigration judge found in favour of the Home Office and the family faces deportation.

The girl, who lives in the northeast and cannot be named, had been given a “sugar-coated” version of why her family had to flee Albania for a new life in Britain. Her father did not tell the child about an alleged assassination attempt on his life by the local mafia.

At an interview with a psychiatric nurse, 48 hours after the girl overdosed in 2016, the child said her family came to Britain to “have access to better healthcare for dad”.

The Home Office was assessing the family’s asylum application at the time and learnt that the girl was “experiencing medical issues”. It requested access to her records for “safeguarding” purposes. But officials found the nurse’s psychiatric assessment and, in an unprecedented step, used it to argue that her father was lying about his reasons for coming to the UK.

If you are in a vulnerable situation, you need to know that you can talk openly to those giving you care in confidence. Of course parents aren’t going to burden their children with dangerous realities if they can avoid it, particularly if they have reason to be worried about a child’s mental state.

The Home Office doesn’t have too many bottoms of barrels left to scrape but this is yet another example of why it is not fit for purpose and should be dismantled and rebuilt with dignity, respect and fairness at the heart of its culture.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Suzanne Fletcher 15th Apr '19 - 10:10am

    As Caron says “The Home Office doesn’t have too many bottoms of barrels left to scrape”. I have just this minute finished the Liberal Democrats for Seekers of Sanctuary April Newsletter, the last one was 4th March. The April newsletter has articles about FOUR instances of the Home Office being found guilty in the High Court. that is just in 6 weeks.
    The policy document there was huge controversy about at our September conference last year has detailed and radical proposals about reforming the present roles of the Home Office, and we need to keep on pressing on those.
    Our first para reads
    “As well as many well researched reports revealing Home Office shortcomings in how it deals with those seeking sanctuary, there are as many as FOUR court cases reported in this newsletter where the Home Office has been found to be dealing with a situation wrongly by the High Court. Surely this is a strong message that the Home Office is not fit for purpose. It needs radical reform as outlined in Lib Dem policy, and a swift end to the Hostile Environment.”
    I’ll now see if I can get hold of the full article behind the paywall, please ?

  • Suzanne Fletcher 15th Apr '19 - 2:30pm

    Having now read the full article, it strikes me that the Home Office comment is about “controlling immigration”. NO it is not about that, it is about establishing a claim for asylum.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Paul Holmes
    Rob, you also say that we can't be the party of the NHS or the Environment because Labour and the Greens have those. Surely it is a mistake to abandon whole are...
  • Paul Holmes
    Rob, you offer two possible groups of key target supporters for the Liberal Democrats. However, both are, as you note, just subsets of the affluent middle class...
  • Peter Wrigley
    @Jana: I regrade myself as an extremest for liberalism: the maximum amount of individual freedom that doesn't infringe the freedom others. I’m also pretty ke...
  • Roland
    >”He’d voted in every general election since 1974, he said, and this was the first time he had ever voted for a winning candidate.” Well I could say t...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Jack, Starmer knew how to have good relations with the Trades Unions. Pity it didn't last. As soon as he was PM he was suspending his own MPs for doing wha...