Labour split on tactical voting advice to supporters

Labour embarked on an odd campaigning trick yesterday. Two of Labour’s most senior (and tribally partisan) figures – Ed Balls and Peter Hain – called publicly on Labour voters to lend their support to the Lib Dems in those seats where the choice is Lib Dem or Tory. It’s inconceible that Ed Balls in particular would do so without the explicit consent of Gordon Brown.

In public Gordon Brown makes the case for a “maximum Labour vote” – how could he do otherwise as party leader? Yet the mixed signals will have given their cue to many Labour voters – whether in Richmond or Cheadle or Cornwall, to name just three areas – that their party’s and country’s best interests are best served by voting Lib Dem.

Officially of course all political parties deprecate tactical voting, quite rightly calling on voters to choose the party they believe in. In reality, all political parties ruthlessly pitch for the tactical vote. The Labservatives try and make out the Lib Dems are a wasted vote, while the Lib Dems counter that accusation with bar-charts showing how close a contest it is in the 40% of the country where the Lib Dems are in first or second place.

Yet Labour’s approach is a stark contrast with five years ago, when Tony Blair, with customary mendacity, deliberately pitched an all-out Lib Dem squeeze message to a credulous media that a vote for the Lib Dems would let in the Tories. In reality, as we all know, a vote for the Lib Dems will – surprise, surprise – get you more Lib Dem MPs.

Of course a lot has changed in the last five years, and I suspect undecided voters are much less open to giving Labour the benefit of the doubt in 2010 than they were in 2005. But still I find Labour’s tactics odd (albeit useful from a Lib Dem perspective). It would have never happened in Tony Blair’s day, that’s for sure. And if Labour does indeed come third in the popular vote tomorrow, I’m sure the Brown/Balls/Hain tactic will be subject to many an internal Labour inquest in the weeks tio come.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I hate tactical voting and I hate having to ask people to vote tactically, but while we are lumbered with this archaic and unrepresentative electoral system there is nothing else we can do.

  • Paul McKeown 6th May '10 - 11:20am

    Vote for what you believe in. If that is Lib Dem, do not vote either Labour or Conservative for fear that the one you dislike most will get in, that’s just weak.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Simon R
    @Joe: I don't think it's at all hypocritical to support Ukraine's right to sovereignty while also not being opposed to attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities. ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @SimonR. I do have a PhD in economics and peer reviewed published papers and I do challenge the whole orthodox approach to economics practised par excellence by...
  • Andy Daer
    @Hina, you might not have got the responses your expected, but I hope you will take heart from those of us who think racism is on the retreat n this country. T...
  • Simon R
    @Steve: Ah, so you want to challenge the whole academic discipline of economics, and all the couple of hundred years of research by many thousands of people tha...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Alas, I beg to differ concerning the validity of current orthodox economics theory, practice and teaching. One objective test of current "Economics" is the ...