Lib Dem Press Release: Lib Dem peers defeat Government on civil liberties

Liberal Democrat peers have defeated the Government on a key vote on the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.

Amendment 15, tabled jointly by Liberal Democrat frontbench spokesperson Brian Paddick and two Labour peers, creates exemptions to the new offence of “entering or remaining in a designated area” so that it doesn’t apply to aid workers, journalists, people visiting ill relatives or those attending funerals.

The amendment passed by 220 votes to 191.

Liberal Democrat peers also voted for another amendment, tabled jointly by Lord Paddick and Baroness Jones, to limit the Bill’s impact on freedom of speech. However, Labour abstained and Tory peers voted against the amendment, so it failed by 93 votes to 198.

Liberal Democrat MPs had previously voted against the Bill in the House of Commons, joined only by Caroline Lucas, but Labour voted with the Tories to pass it 376–10.

Brian Paddick, Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson for Home Affairs, said:

Through our opposition to these unnecessary, illiberal new laws, we have secured important changes that will reduce the risk of innocent people being wrongly convicted.

However, we are still fundamentally opposed to much of the Bill, most of which is based on the discredited ‘conveyor belt’ theory: that simply expressing extreme views inevitably leads to radicalisation and terrorist violence.

Completely innocent people could be arrested and detained simply for expressing an opinion or for undertaking legitimate research.

It would also allow people to be detained at ports, airports and the border area between Northern Ireland and the Republic, have the contents of their phones and computers gone through, even if they had no intention of committing any offence.

We must do all we can to protect our country, but not at the cost of losing our own liberty.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • David Warren 3rd Dec '18 - 9:43pm

    Great news.

    We can always rely on the Liberal Democrats to defend civil liberties.

  • Good work – keep it up!

    I realise that civil liberties issues are a minority interest, but someone needs to fight this corner. Like with the proposed 15 year sentences for accessing extremist content online, this is terrible law, and is part of a pattern of increasingly forcing people to prove their innocence.

    Rather than facing the inconvenience of having to prove that people are up to no good e.g. by actually being involved in planning or carrying out terror attacks, the law now seeks to punish the far more easily proven “crimes” of being in the wrong place or visiting the wrong web site, and requiring the accused to rely on a subjective “legitimate interest” defence.

    Apart from a 15 year sentence being disproportionate for someone who hasn’t been shown to be doing any physical harm, it can only act to deter genuine academic or journalistic research.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 11th Jul - 11:45am
    It used to be the case that the government disliked unemployment, and provided support for those who had lost their jobs. The economy changes all...
  • User AvatarTony Harris 11th Jul - 11:15am
    Seems to be a very secretive organisation? Almost impossible to find any company or financial information on it either in the UK, Switzerland, or Denmark....
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 11th Jul - 10:50am
    Peter Martin, If you want to understand the UK economy, pay attention to what British economists like Martin Wolf or Pau Johnson at the IFS...
  • User AvatarNigel Jones 11th Jul - 10:42am
    Agree Antony. There would need to be a plan to hugely improve public transport, especially buses for people to use their cars less. This needs...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Jul - 10:10am
    @ Antony Watts, ".......a marvellous thing. Freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital." The Treaty of Lisbon was just another step in the...
  • User Avatarrichard underhill 11th Jul - 9:31am
    Tom Arms | Fri 10th July 2020 - 1:48 pm "warned of anti-American Marxist infiltration of Black Lives Matter" So, is Donald Trump a Marxist?...