Tag Archives: national security

7 December 2018 – today’s press releases

I’ve spent my evening helping Colchester Liberal Democrats to select their new PPC, which is why this is a bit late in the day. I’m hoping that we’ll have their press release tomorrow, which is why I’m not telling you who won… So, without further ado, here are today’s press releases…

  • Davey: Brexit gambling UK’s safety and security
  • Liberal Democrats lead the march to a people’s vote
  • Labour must guarantee a people’s vote
  • The Economist backs a people’s vote
  • Brexit would put the brakes on Britain, F1 bosses warn

Davey: Brexit gambling UK’s safety and security

Responding to the Home Affairs Select Committee Report on the Home …

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , and | 1 Comment

Lib Dem Press Release: Lib Dem peers defeat Government on civil liberties

Liberal Democrat peers have defeated the Government on a key vote on the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.

Amendment 15, tabled jointly by Liberal Democrat frontbench spokesperson Brian Paddick and two Labour peers, creates exemptions to the new offence of “entering or remaining in a designated area” so that it doesn’t apply to aid workers, journalists, people visiting ill relatives or those attending funerals.

The amendment passed by 220 votes to 191.

Liberal Democrat peers also voted for another amendment, tabled jointly by Lord Paddick and Baroness Jones, to limit the Bill’s impact on freedom of speech. However, Labour abstained and Tory peers voted against the amendment, so it failed by 93 votes to 198.

Liberal Democrat MPs had previously voted against the Bill in the House of Commons, joined only by Caroline Lucas, but Labour voted with the Tories to pass it 376–10.

Brian Paddick, Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson for Home Affairs, said:

Through our opposition to these unnecessary, illiberal new laws, we have secured important changes that will reduce the risk of innocent people being wrongly convicted.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 2 Comments

Opinion: State security measures can protect liberty not just threaten it

Benjamin Franklin, Old Town Hall, Boston (493550)It is an unwritten law of Lib Dem debates on security issues that before long someone will quote Benjamin Franklin that ‘Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.’

I have always been intrigued by the origins of this comment, primarily because taken on its own and literally, it is hyperbolic nonsense. Almost any form of government involves some tension between liberty and security. The state provides defence and police forces, but to do so levies taxes and circumscribes individuals’ freedom to use force to defend themselves.

There seems to be very little on the web about what Franklin actually meant. But an academic paper by Benjamin Wittes of Brookings Institute unsurprisingly reveals that Franklin’s aphorism was intended in a very different sense from that in which it is now so often quoted.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 7 Comments

LibLink: Lord Wallace – EU membership is essential for Britain’s national security

European FlagWriting on the European Movement UK blog, Lord (William) Wallace has some interesting thoughts on the importance of European cooperation to Britain’s strategic and security interests.

Here’s a snippet:

The 2010 National Security Strategy stood out from its predecessors by its inclusion of a number of non-military threats among the most serious it sees as facing Britain: global epidemics, organised crime and cross-border terrorism , the impact of climate change, and cyber-attack.

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged and | 6 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st Nov - 6:38pm
    @ Bill le Breton "there now are circumstances in which we would support a Johnson minority government." If that happens that's me gone for good...
  • User AvatarRossMcL 21st Nov - 6:35pm
    Bill - if there is a hung parliament we can vote on things issue by issue. So, if the Tories are the largest party they...
  • User AvatarMartin 21st Nov - 6:35pm
    The policy always was that the Party would support a new referendum if proposed by another party. To me this seemed more obviously aimed at...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 21st Nov - 6:01pm
    David, WA = The withdrawal agreement PD = The Political Declaration on future UK/EU relationship WAB = The Withdrawal Agreement Bill
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 21st Nov - 5:57pm
    It is not 'lofty theorising'. Last night the party 'pivoted' away from Revoke. The pivot is that there now are circumstances in which we would...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st Nov - 5:43pm
    @ Bill le Breton " WA/PD – in the WAB". Could we please have a translation of this before I get completely Wabbed. Wabber, wabber...