LibLink … Nick Clegg: The Liberal Democrats are not for sale

Over at The Times, Nick Clegg has penned an article setting out, perhaps in the clearest detail yet, exactly how the Lib Dems will respond in the event of a ‘hung Parliament’. He begins by noting the heat-without-light debate that the new year has brought:

Much of what we have heard so far is unsurprising: absurd pledges on spending, vitriolic attacks on cuts. But one development is new: both the old parties now claim to be almost identical to the Liberal Democrats. David Cameron and Gordon Brown are ostentatiously flirting with Liberal Democrat voters, clumsily trying to woo them — and by implication me and my fellow Liberal Democrat MPs.

And then it’s onto the ‘hung Parliament’ question:

This year’s general election is likely to be the most open and unpredictable in a generation. So you have a right to know where we stand. I can promise voters wondering whether to put an “X” against the Liberal Democrats that there are no backroom deals or under-the-counter “understandings” with either of the other two parties.

As Nick notes, the last 50 years have seen a transformation in British politics – from the 1950s, when Labour and the Tories hoovered up 98% of the votes cast, to the 2009 local elections, when other parties, including the Lib Dems, scored 40%. The reason, at least in part, is simple:

On so many issues in recent years, Liberal Democrat instincts have been in tune with the British public: on Iraq, civil liberties, political reform, the environment, fair taxes, the excesses of the City of London, the rights of Gurkha veterans.

Which brings us to Nick’s ringing declaration:

We are, and have shown ourselves to be, very different from the other two parties. My message to Mr Brown and Mr Cameron is simple: the Liberal Democrats are up for real change. We are not up for sale.

So, how would Nick respond in the event of a ‘hung Parliament’? Well, there are two governing principles:

One, we will respect the will of the public. The voters are in charge and the decision is theirs. If voters decide that no party deserves an overall majority, then self-evidently the party with the strongest mandate will have a moral right to be the first to seek to govern on its own or, if it chooses, to seek alliances with other parties.

Two, regardless of the post-election arithmetic or whatever power we are granted, there are four objectives that we will unwaveringly pursue.

And Nick maps out those four objectives:

First: fair taxes. Our plan would mean that the first £10,000 you earn would be free of income tax. This would be paid for by taxing income and capital at the same rate, phasing out special pension subsidies for highest-rate earners, switching tax from income to pollution and introducing a mansion tax on the value of homes above £2 million.

Second: a fair start for all our children.
We will cut class sizes and provide more one-to-one tuition to children by introducing a new “pupil premium” in our schools.

Third: a fair and sustainable economy that creates jobs. We will use the money from one year’s cuts in current spending to create tens of thousands of new jobs in public transport, a national programme of home insulation and new social housing. We will be honest about where savings must be made to balance the books and we will break up the banking system.

And finally, fair, clean and local politics. We will introduce a fair voting system, ensure that MPs can be sacked by their constituents if they break the rules, return powers to local communities and stop tax avoiders from standing for Parliament, sitting in the House of Lords or donating to political parties.

Seems like a good list to me … sound economic management, tax cuts for the poorest, climate change, fair votes and decentralisation, pupil premium: pretty much all the touchstone liberal issues.

What do LDV’s readers think of what Nick has to say? Has he done enough to put to bed the interminably tedious ‘who would the Lib Dems back’ question beloved of worn-out political hacks? Or has he opened up a can of worms unnecessarily?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Anthony Aloysius St 5th Jan '10 - 8:53am

    “… self-evidently the party with the strongest mandate will have a moral right to be the first to seek to govern on its own or, if it chooses, to seek alliances with other parties.”

    Which says absolutely nothing about “how would Nick respond”, of course!

  • Judging by today’s “Today” the “who will he back?” question is not going away in a hurry …

  • I thought it was a strong performance by Nick. I just feel sorry for all of us having to constantly listen to journalists and media bundits going over and over this ground as they are to lazy to actually go and cover anything more interesting and substantial.

  • He should have said this when asked the question a few weeks ago on TV.

    Of course he will not tell the press, as he will not know himself till the election is over, and the party sit down to agree on what they will do.

    First: fair taxes.
    Our plan would mean that the first £10,000 you earn would be free of income tax.
    I think all the parties will offer this before the election.

    Second: a fair start for all our children.
    We will cut class sizes and provide more one-to-one tuition to children by introducing a new “pupil premium”
    So do we build more schools, and employ more staff? What class sizes are we talking about?
    Sounds good, but will not work at present.

    Third: a fair and sustainable economy that creates jobs.
    We will use the money from one year’s cuts in current spending to create tens of thousands of new jobs in public transport, a national programme of home insulation and new social housing.

    Why not have all new properties have full insulation installed, including solar heating?
    What are we talking about “new jobs in public transport” Buying new transport from overseas? So these new jobs are the people now out of work “Design Engineers” etc going to become bus drivers? They will come back from Poland to fill these jobs.
    New social housing is a must, and a vote winner.
    There is now over 5,000,000 not working in the UK, but trying to fit square pegs into round holes will be a problem.
    We have lost under Labour 1,000s of skilled jobs, and replaced them with un-skilled jobs.
    The market we should be looking at is Green” Technology, Electric Cars (Japan and China plus the USA are well down this road) and just where do we build Wind Turbines in the UK?
    Brown has left us at the back of the queue here, while he was happy having his dinners with his City bankers.
    Germany is well down the road in building new Solar Panels in North Africa to supply electricity back to Germany.

    And finally, fair, clean and local politics.
    We will introduce a fair voting system, ensure that MPs can be sacked by their constituents if they break the rules, return powers to local communities and stop tax avoiders from standing for Parliament, sitting in the House of Lords or donating to political parties.
    We all know that both Labour or the Tories will not agree the voting system that the LibDems want, but I think they will agree with most of the rest.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Michael BG, "I like to think that about 40% of any increase in government spending comes back to government in increased revenue. " It all co...
  • john oundle
    Janet King 'Well done to President Macron for reading our Lib Dem policy on offering safe and legal routes to those seeking asylum in the U.K. His offer to a...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Joe, I was somewhat familiar with Michael Hudson and his book Super Imperialism long before I'd heard of MMT. I was naturally sympathetic to his argument a...
  • Janet King
    Well done to President Macron for reading our Lib Dem policy on offering safe and legal routes to those seeking asylum in the U.K. His offer to allow U.K. Immig...
  • Martin
    Helen Dudden: You wrote virtually the same on another thread. It is no more coherent there, despite having had time to work on it. What are you trying to s...