Protecting Nature After Brexit

Embed from Getty Images

Liberal Democrat MEP Catherine Bearder has put pen to paper in a letter to MIchael Gove MP, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

This joint letter to Mr Gove was also signed by Seb Dance MEP, Keith Taylor MEP and Julie Girling MEP.  Together, these MEPs form a cross-party group of UK MEPs who sit on the European Parliament’s Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee.

The letter follows the successful vote on November 15th in Strasbourg on the EU Parliamentary Motion calling for EU governments and the Commission to properly fund Natura 2000 sites which are vital to the protection of European nature and biodiversity.

The letter says:

While the European Parliament welcomes the fact the Commission is taking steps in the right direction, the Motion also states our concerns that the 2020 targets for biodiversity will not be met “without immediate, substantial and additional efforts”. The Parliament has also noted that the 2010 targets were not met and that the Commission has not commenced work on a plan for post-2020.

The loss of biodiversity is a real concern: not only do we owe it to future generations to protect flora and fauna, we must also recognise the impact the loss of biodiversity has on ecosystems and human life and ensure our legislative priorities reflect this.

The planetary boundaries framework states that losing more than 10% of the biodiversity in an area places the local ecosystem at risk. And yet a concerning 2016 report states that 58% of the world’s land coverage already falls below this safe level. They find that the global average of biodiversity has dropped to 85% of that of unaffected ecosystems.

One way the EU seeks to address the issue is through the Natura 2000 scheme, which costs €5.8 billion but is estimated to yield benefits of €200-300 billion, protects over 18 % of the EU’s land area and almost 6 % of its marine territory, and it is the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world.

While it is clear to us the EU has found ensuring the Birds and Habitats Directives are implemented and biodiversity targets are met challenging, it is also clear that the loss of biodiversity can only be tackled by working with our neighbours at a supranational level.

With this in mind we have three questions:

  • What funding does the UK Government currently receive from the Natura 2000 scheme;
  • Will this funding be matched by the government after an exit from the European Union;
  • What preparatory work has the UK government been doing to ensure there are mechanisms in place
    for continued collaboration in tackling the loss of biodiversity after we exit the European Union.

The issue of the loss of biodiversity cannot be pushed to the bottom of the pile by an ever-increasingly complex Brexit negotiation process.

We look forward to your response answering our questions above.

 

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHelen Dudden 19th Jul - 8:42am
    @Sean Hyland. I agree with most of your comments. It should be more than what you look like, or if your phone is better. We...
  • User AvatarGeoff Payne 19th Jul - 8:33am
    In response to Laura Gordon’’s comment, I have spoken to the Chair of YL about organising a meeting with members of their Exec and FCC...
  • User AvatarPayasoru 19th Jul - 8:32am
    For me the main reason for NOT seeking a rerun of the 2016 referendum is that it’s actually impossible. It would obviously involve giving people...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 19th Jul - 8:04am
    As a fairly well-off middle-class retiree of some years, I am very supportive of the idea that people like me should pay more tax. We...
  • User AvatarTom Harney 19th Jul - 7:52am
    I do not have strong views on what Conference does or does not debate. We need though to recognise that world war 2 is over,...
  • User AvatarGlenn 19th Jul - 7:43am
    Frankie. As I've said to you many times. I simply do not support the concept of the EU. Anyway, I'm not getting into this with...