Negative impact of Covid-19 on people with a learning (or intellectual) disability

This is a version of a post, revised by the author, that originally appeared earlier this week.

The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the unacceptable health inequalities faced by people with a learning (or intellectual) disability. This has been brought home by the JCVI decision not to prioritise them adequately during the vaccination programme and has been highlighted in an article in the British Medical Journal on which this blog draws heavily for the benefit of a lay readership.

It is estimated that only about 250,000 adults are registered as having a learning disability with their GP’s, although there are estimated to be c.1.5 million people in this country with this particular diagnosis.  One of the serious indications of learning disability is an inability or difficulty in reading the written word, a difficulty shared by many more who don’t meet all the criteria to have a learning disability, including for example, over 50% of those in prison in the UK. Inability to read is often accompanied by other limitations on comprehension, which helps to explain why people with learning disability are slow to understand when they are ill and to seek or be offered medical care.  The result is reduced life expectancy – people with learning disability die on average 25 years earlier than the general population.

The charity Beyond Words produces books and leaflets that tell stories with pictures to help people with learning disability lead their lives.  It has produced a series of books since the outbreak of COVID to explain about COVID – the symptoms, how to keep safe, vaccinations etc.

In spite of Beyond Words’ efforts, and those of other LD charities, last year Public Health England found that, between the ages of 18-34, the death rate of people with LD from COVID -19 was 30 times higher than for people in the same age group without a disability. The overall death rate for people with LD was estimated to be up to 6.3 times higher than the general population. The application of blanket “do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation” orders on people with LD during the pandemic made matters worse in some places, and yet this group  is so far still not being prioritised for vaccination.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) considers that prioritisation should “maximise benefit and reduce harm” and “mitigate health inequalities.”  As the BMJ article points out:

People living in care homes for older adults have been made the first priority, yet people with ID, despite sharing many of the same risks as this group from living in congregate settings, have been treated in a more haphazard way. People with Down’s syndrome are deemed “extremely clinically vulnerable” and appear fourth on the vaccine priority list, alongside adults aged 70 years and over. People aged 16-64 with underlying health conditions that put them at higher risk of serious disease and mortality are ranked sixth—this includes people with a severe or profound ID, but not those with mild or moderate ID.

Even before the pandemic, fewer than two in five people with ID lived beyond 65 years of age. We now know that people with ID who are affected by COVID 19 die at a younger age than those in the general population. A vaccine policy which does not account for this is discriminatory; it has failed to make reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010, with an overemphasis on chronological age.

As in so many other aspects of handling the pandemic,  I support the view of the authors of the BMJ article that the government should follow the example of Germany and offer vaccination to people with learning disability as a priority.



* John Kelly is a member in Warwick District, Secretary of the Lib Dem Friends of Palestine, and a member of the Federal International Relations Committee.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • David Craddock 8th Feb '21 - 5:48pm

    It’s really important to highlight this as an issue. Well done John.

  • Josephine Leppard 8th Feb '21 - 8:33pm

    It would be good if our Parliamentary Spokesperson for Health would take this issue up with the relevant ministers.

  • To me, the most shocking thing revealed in this article is the blanket application of DNR when people with impaired mental capacity are being treated for COVID 19. I find it hard to believe this really happens. If it is true, failing to push such people to the front of the vaccine queue seems another extraordinarily cynical judgement.
    One is tempted to wonder if this is of a piece with the way elderly care home residents were placed in greater jeopardy than anyone else during the initial lock-down last year, with PPE unavailable for staff, and hospitals transferring COVID-infected patients to care homes.
    At the very least the treatment of those with learning disabilities shows lack of awareness, and lack of compassion. It couldn’t possibly be the case that some of those in the higher levels of the UK plc decision-making process saw COVID 19 as a way to cull a non-productive part of the labour force. Or could it ?

  • Helen Dudden 9th Feb '21 - 9:31am

    DNR, is a sad fact of life, who can judge who should live or die.
    The lack of medical treatment for cancer patients, and those, who need on going urgent medical treatment, did
    As a disabled person, the Acktion T4, was one the most upsetting elements of the concentration camp. I think the Holocaust Remembrance Day recently brought that to mind.

  • nigel hunter 11th Feb '21 - 12:58pm

    There does seem a suspicion that Cummings and Johnsons govnt is still around dealing with a back door Eugenics plan.Is it also possible that the govnt will like to drag on the Virus etc to divert from Bre,xit which will shape the country for far longer than the virus?

  • I feel a little responsible for the train of thought in the last two comments. I questioned whether decisions to ‘let nature take it’s course’ might be skewed against relatively young people with learning disabilities, and whether, if true, that meant those with LD should be fast-tracked for vaccination. It has long been the case that very elderly and sick people with an extremely poor quality of life are encouraged to opt for DNR. There is a considerable difference between that and an actual eugenics plan, which would need (and surely would not get) the complicity of the medical profession.

  • Helen Dudden 12th Feb '21 - 8:38am

    We could argue the legality of treating Covid only patient’s.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Joe Bourke
    Greece made vaccines mandatory for those over 60, while Austria has also mandated the jab from February in a bid to stem the spread of Covid. Germany seems to w...
  • Jenny Barnes
    nigel hunter ".In coalitions we will always make friends AND enemies." mm. it's probably best not to make enemies of one's own party, though....
  • John Marriott
    Quite right, David. Scotland had its own king back then. Actually it was the other Mary (Queen of Scots), wasn’t it?...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Simon R " Compared to the UK, I believe France tends to have a slower/more onerous bureaucratic framework " You believe? do you have actual evidence - please...
  • John Marriott
    Say what you like (and the usual suspects will) I know which half of the last decade I would be prepared to relive, and it certainly wasn’t the second half. ...