#NewMembersDay Why I joined the Liberal Democrats #6

Like many of my generation I have always been liberal, but it wasn’t until I first heard Nick Clegg talk about liberal values, that I began to suspect that I was a Liberal Democrat. Although I have always been interested and indirectly involved in politics I could never commit myself to any party. Through my professional career, I almost (accidentally) became a Conservative, co-authoring a policy paper for the oldest conservative think-tank, attending party conferences, but never feeling at home or at ease with the polarity of a party that houses rabid eurosceptics, social conservatives, libertarians and economic free-marketeers. The 2015 General Election has done nothing but confirm that I am, in fact a Liberal Democrat to the core, and damn the consequences.

Since polling day I have read and heard commentary questioning the point of the Lib Dems, mainly from Conservatives, cynically attempting to lock up their electoral majority for 2020. When I look at the alternatives I couldn’t disagree with them more. Politics is increasingly about what…what policies, and what benefit they bring to individuals or interest groups, the politics of self-interest. Almost no consideration is given to the more important question of why. When I think back to first hearing Nick talk about liberal values: about freedom, fairness and equality these fundamental principles resonated with how I live my life, they were my why.

It is all too easy to get caught up in the dogma of Left and Right, but the truth is that very few normal people fall exclusively into either camp, we agree with some things, and disagree with others to varying degrees. Our next leader must resist the conformity of defining our party in terms of left or right, as our fundamental principles of liberty and social justice cut across both sides. Already an unshackled Conservative government is talking about reducing liberty in the name of security, for employees and repealing the Human Rights Act, which is why liberals need to act, and now.

As the owner of a small business and an employer it is my genuine belief that the Liberal Democrats are the true party of social mobility. Conservatives can’t talk on this subject with any authenticity while at the same time drawing their narrow viewpoint from the same old families, schools and backgrounds, Labour is no better. Liberal Democrats can champion education as the catalyst to improve opportunity and the economy for all.

I am really excited about the possibilities for the future of our party, and am proud to call myself a Liberal Democrat.

* Mike Hewitson is a pharmacist by background, and own two businesses in rural West Dorset.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

  • Caroline cherry 13th May '15 - 11:18pm

    Agreed,education must be the catalyst for change. We need this as otherwise we end up in an ever competing whirlpool of interests. I really want the NHS to survive but I do not feel that modernisation will destroy it. I also felt labour talked about the NHS entirely in terms of workers conditions. The general public need certain standards and these sometimes clash with workers rights. I’m thinking of seven day access . Many would argue this is impossible but I think this is something that could be achieved.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    “If the purpose of an economy is not to do that, then what is the incentive for those at the bottom to remain engaged in the economy, democracy and even socie...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Peter Martin As far as I am concerned the terrorism issuue is not relevant to my point. My point is that the level of violence used against the police offic...
  • Simon McGrath
    "Over the very same years, the public wealth of the country fell from a positive £337 billion to minus £1 trillion." This is obviously nonsense "That is no...
  • Neil Hickman
    @David - Granted, by 1979 the "progressive" nature of the income tax system had become ridiculous. The top rate of income tax was 83% and you had an "investment...
  • Tom Reeve
    Thanks Jana and David for your comments. @Jana - if the purpose of an economy is to spread the benefits of economic growth fairly among the populace accordi...