Opinion: Making it easier to follow conference

Liberal Democrats returned home last week from another Conference: holding government ministers to account; debating policy (even nearly managing the rare feat of throwing out a policy paper); catching up with friends. But while it’s fresh in Conference Committee’s minds, I have some small suggestions for next time. Talking to Lib Dems who may not have read every word of the Agenda or Conference Daily updates, and to people who were watching at home on BBC2 or BBC Parliament in their vast ratings of one or two, just a few simple changes could make Conference a lot easier to follow.

Have you ever come into a Conference debate having left your Agenda in your hotel room, by accident or through not wishing to add five minutes to your ‘physical security check’ by bringing a bag? Have you ever forgotten to pop by the information stand and pick up the Conference Daily sheets? Or have you ever watched some of Conference on TV, in which all of those items are conspicuously missing from the screen? Then rather than looking down at us as if we’re all insufficiently committed, perhaps the powers that be should consider admitting reality and making it easy for people to find out what’s going on at a glance, or in a sentence. And most of the work is already there – it just needs bringing together.

There is already an @LibDemConf Twitter account that announces the name of each debate as it starts. And there is already a supply of all the Conference papers online, if you know where to look and can navigate through all the many screens to get to them. But no attempt is ever made to bring these together. Why not tweet a bit.ly link to the appropriate policy paper with the announcement of the start of each debate? And another, with a link to the Conference Agenda, also telling you on which page to find the motion under debate? And again, a link to the relevant Conference Daily to find any amendments, again highlighting the page number? All of this paperwork is already available online in pdf form, and it would be the work of moments to actually show people how to find it when it’s needed.

The same could be done within the Conference Hall, for the aid of representatives there and of people watching at home (or in their hotels). Perhaps BBC Parliament might be frosty about putting up non-BBC links, but it’s worth asking; if not, each debate speaker has a ginormous screen behind them onto which the Party projects their image and information about them. Why not add a web address and the simple message, ‘If you want to know what’s going on in this particular debate, enter this and it’ll tell you’?

You may well argue that every representative should assiduously read every bit of paperwork, that no-one should vote on an issue without hearing the whole debate, and that if proposers and summators of motions and amendments should be able to express clearly what their motions and amendments are about, and if they can’t, that’s their own lookout. But if you’re scrambling to find the bit of paper that would explain what line 4 of Amendment 3 says when the Chair of the session is briskly running through the votes, or if you’re at home without a steward standing by you to thrust paper into your hand, that’s not a lot of help.

So wouldn’t it be better if the Chair and Aide of each debate were not just to announce which website to go to, but to agree in advance a one-line factual description of each motion and amendment with their proposers? So that each debate could open not merely with a nebulous ‘Motion F72, More Regulation For A Freer Britain’, but with one scene-setting sentence that captures the main thrust – and, more importantly, the Chair could give those explanatory lines about the amendments at the end. Wouldn’t that blizzard of numbers make more sense if each vote on each amendment was preceded by one simple sentence that summarises in neutral terms what each contains? Particularly for all those debates where an amendment was not opposed and there’s not even a summator to remind you what you’re voting on. And for TV viewers, the combination of a simple guide from the Chair and a visible link to more information on the website would make the Conference a lot less incomprehensible.

These are simple changes, not time-consuming, with all the work of creating pdfs and putting them online already done. Why not just make them easier to find?

Of course, they all usually dry up sometime after each Conference, making it difficult to locate our policy once we’ve actually passed it, and there are no hyperlinking cross-references in the online papers (note the several just this year that referred to the excellent but long-deleted Policy Paper 50: It’s About Freedom from a decade ago, removed from the Party website and sold out from the Party publishers, as if we all have it kept by our bedsides as light reading matter). But making the current Conference paperwork more accessible would be a start.

Alex Wilcock blogs at Love and Liberty, on which he has just written a rather less positive Conference follow-up about the shortcomings of the Conference Hotel.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Conference and Op-eds.


  • “So wouldn’t it be better if the Chair and Aide of each debate were not just to announce which website to go to, but to agree in advance a one-line factual description of each motion and amendment with their proposers?”
    Actually, it was done on the BBC coverage (at the bottom of the screen, a single line to say roughly what the amendment/motion was about).

    I agree we should have an app (I realise an app is costly to develop, especially as it’d have to be multi-platform, not just iphone thank you), or at least a mobile website.
    But the papers there should be html, cross-referenced with consultation papers and whatever else it might refer to, not pdf (which is a pain to read let alone find things in).
    An app might even allow to take notes.

  • Andrew Suffield 2nd Oct '11 - 3:22pm

    Have you ever forgotten to pop by the information stand and pick up the Conference Daily sheets?

    Ask any of the stewards in the main auditorium. They’re all holding a pile for exactly this reason.

  • nigel quinton 4th Oct '11 - 12:39pm

    Excellent comments Alex. Could I also add that I was surprised to find that it is already impossible to locate a link to Tim Farron’s wonderful speech – no longer available on i-player and absent from the party website.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Martin @ Chris @ Leekliberal, I've always been puzzled why so many who claim to be on the left seem to have fallen in love with the most neoliberal of capi...
  • David Raw
    @ Alex Macfie "We were never even in contention in most of the Blue Wall seats we are now targeting". ...... and what makes you so sure they won't return t...
  • Cassie
    Tories lied to farmers ('you'll be better off out of the EU/CAP'). And the likes of Coffey showed an ignorance of rural life only matched by Labour's prejudice ...
  • Martin Bennett
    Chris Moore (and Leekliberal): P Martin is left wing on his say so, however in a choice between maintaining living standards for the worse off and Brexit, he go...
  • Peter Wrigley
    Re the post-2010 Austerity and the wickedness of the Liberal Democrats in conniving at, even promoting, it - It is interesting to note that Rafael Behr in tod...