Opinion: the undignified spectacle at the G8

Imagine the scene. It’s a dirty whitewashed three-storey government building in the capital city, surrounded by high walls with US helicopters parked around. Inside sit several US generals and two Europeans, in the dusty heat. The war they are there to discuss is secretly assumed to go on for 25 years. They all know they cannot win it despite superior air power and unlimited cash. They had all given it their best shot with use of terrible weapons. Neighbouring countries have been mercilessly bombed, and ushering in governments very unfriendly to the US and the West.

It was time to find a facesaving formula and begin to draw down the troops. The PR angle was agreed – to call it localization of forces; the pretense of handing power over to the local military, and of it all going according to plan. They knew that one day soon the capital would be overrun. In the middle of all this there was a looming US election, with the opposition candidate supported by parts of the US military, trying to delay ‘troops home’ until after the election. The face saving was only that of generals, not the politicians.

No it is not Afghanistan, it was Vietnam 1969. The localization was called ‘Vietnamization’ instead of the current ‘Afghanization’, and the cross-border bombing was in Cambodia and Laos, not Pakistan.

So now we have the head of the UK Coalition government at the G8 summit going along with the pretense in Afghanistan. The war is going well, we hear. It’s all ‘on track’. Some would have been briefed that it is going to be left ‘messy’. Maybe they should all be briefed on the reality of those final 6 years in Vietnam, and acquire some extra wisdom.

Funny isn’t it how, despite our ‘success’, key roads even in Kabul are off limits to ISAF forces, the parallel insurgent local governance is more popular than government structures, and oh yes rape of young girls is legal again. A key war aim was to deny terrorists the freedom to operate in territory not controlled by the state. But the majority of territory has been insurgent-controlled for quite some time.

Whilst one cannot forget that brave troops and dedicated aid workers have achieved extraordinary things in supremely dangerous circumstances, one cannot also deny that the achievements have been a drop in the ocean, and sadly billions in cash have been wasted or stolen.

We can learn the lessons of the past and exit in a more honest way. They key focus should not be saving the face of the generals. It should be achieving a negotiated settlement with those countries having an interest in the insurgency (India & Pakistan primarily) plus agreements between the West and both Afghanistan & Pakistan or border-related issues. A legacy of peace is the aim, not another 10 years of face-saving pretense whilst Kabul is overrun and more die. That is in Britain’s national interest.

I lived in San Francisco in 1970 and saw the Vietnam vets coming home. One vet friend used to drive on a child’s cycle the wrong way up the freeway, he had become so unhinged. Horrific. In Afghanistan all IASF members have more vets injured than have been reported.

I worked in a political role in Afghanistan a couple of years ago and traveled outside Kabul. The despair of UK officials has been widely reported, and I’ve seen it first hand. But we are in the Coalition now and in a better position to inject some sanity into our approach, and drive out that despair. It is not too late for the UK to come out of Afghanistan holding its head high, but we need to take a stand.

* Paul Reynolds works with multilateral organisations as an independent adviser on international relations, economics, and senior governance. He is an elected member of FIRC and an Executive member of Liberal International (British Group).

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and Op-eds.


  • Richard Dean 22nd May '12 - 5:57pm

    I suggest that the lessons we need to learn are not so much about our dignity, as about the dignity of the peoples we abuse. Wanting to change a society where, in your words, the “rape of young girls is legal” is a very fine aim. The problem is that it doesn’t get sorted by military means. No-one really seems to have immediate solutions, but the experiences you describe and omit do suggest that the solutions need to be found and led locally, not from outside.

  • I don’t know about the G8 summit being ” briefed on the reality of those final 6 years in Vietnam”, we went in spite of having: Afghanistan’s recent history still ringing in our ears, namely the Anglo-Afghan Wars and the more recent occupation by the USSR ), our (GB’s) direct experience of Northern Ireland and the conflicts arising during the break up of the Soviet Union specifically the Third Balkian War (1991-2001).

    The one bit of good news is that our, more respectful, approach to China seems to be delivering mutual benefits; although whether Mao would approve of the new China is open to question.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 12th Nov - 8:41am
    David Allen: This election was "well-timed for Johnson", but so was the 2017 election for Theresa May. We know what happened there. Johnson didn't get...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 12th Nov - 7:07am
    Keith Browning: Meanwhile at the coalface, while canvassing in the #1 Tory-held Lib Dem target seat in the country (Richmond Park), I came across a...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 11th Nov - 11:05pm
    Cathy M, you're right, the third reason why this election is an unsatisfactory way of promoting the Remain cause is because the two main parties...
  • User AvatarGeoff Payne 11th Nov - 11:05pm
    Thanks for posting this, Caron. As you know the Federal Elections are presently underway. Before reading the article, I had already agreed with the other...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 11th Nov - 10:56pm
    Jayne Mansfield, To me, the primary problem with Corbyn's approach to Brexit is that it's just too late to consider it. We have already had...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 11th Nov - 10:19pm
    Some lines do not scan well. For example, instead of “Demonstrate the strength of the British/Backing all MPs doing right”, why not “Showing the strength...