Parity of esteem for mental health – petition to change Health and Safety legislation

Back in 2016 I wrote a blog explaining my efforts to raise awareness of mental health first aid which led to an Early Day Motion being submitted by Norman Lamb MP.

There is now a further campaign led by MHFA England to change health and safety legislation so that there is parity of esteem between mental and physical first aid. Where’s Your Head At? is calling for every workplace to provide Mental Health First Aid as well as physical first aid.

The call is simple:

By law, all workplaces, schools and colleges must make provision around physical first aid. Why not the same for mental health?

Mental health issues including stress, anxiety and depression are the biggest cause of sickness absence in our society. Mental Health First Aid courses teach people to spot the signs of mental health issues, offer initial help and guide a person towards support. When support and treatment is accessed early, people recover faster and have better outcomes for their health.

Training people in mental health awareness and skills also helps to build an open and supportive culture around mental health. This can stop preventable health issues arising in the first place, and empower people with mental health issues to thrive in work.

We believe that mental and physical health should be treated equally – because we all have mental health. Let’s change the law to reflect this.

Besides the profound benefit this will have to those suffering mental ill-health but remaining unsupported and undiagnosed, changing this legislation will also save businesses an estimated £35 billion per year.

Please consider signing the petition. It can be found here.

* Kirsten Johnson is the PPC for North Devon and Day Editor of Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 25th Jun - 8:14am
    @ Mark, "England win 6-1....." I've noticed a lot more St George flags flying since our team have started to do well. But the flag...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 25th Jun - 8:04am
    On the whole I take the view that this was an arrangement that two local parties came to and that was up to them. They...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 25th Jun - 7:59am
    @ Gordon Lishman, You say: "your comment does sound like adolescent cynicism " But you don't say it's wrong. How can you when your leader...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 25th Jun - 7:58am
    To be fair to 'Liberator', it published two one-page articles on the Richmond arrangement - one for and one against.
  • User AvatarWilliam Fowler 25th Jun - 6:29am
    Yes, all rather odd isn't it? The Conservatives are supposed to be the party of big business yet big business mostly wants to stay in...
  • User AvatarKeith Legg 25th Jun - 5:19am
    I suppose that technically, though, we were actually three votes from regaining it - two would only have meant a tie and so the drawing...