Of course, I read that caption from earlier today as a mark of praise rather than of exasperation:
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Why community politics matters (Mark Corner)
-
A Federal Britain: 1. Renewing democracy through fair representation (Iain Donaldson)
-
A roadmap to Queer Equality (Tara Foster)
-
A strange but welcome feeling (Jennie Rigg)
-
Fifteen years ago today…… (Caron Lindsay)
-
The Joy of Six 1528
-
Endometriosis and acetylation
-
Reform makes first gain from Conservatives in this by-election cycle
-
How Chancellor Reeves torpedoed the economy
-
Council by-election results scorecard 2026-2027
-
The Disneyfication of Hayley Mills
-
Hodge and his Masters and The Choirmaster's Burial
-
Survation now put Andy Burnham 10 points ahead in Makerfield
-
A perpetual pirouette of prevarication?
-
Michael Meadowcroft: A Liberal of Intellectual Rigour and Uncommon Integrity
Recent Comments
Tom Bailey
Always, debate settles on the assumption that “... most voters don’t understand …” and it infuriates and entrenches the anger of voters who want less go...
Leonora Scipio
Kira Collins makes an important point about trans men being able to get pregnancy protections but this needs to go further. Trans men also need access to women'...
Kira Collins
“ Westminster would become a genuine federal parliament responsible for defence, foreign affairs, national security, macroeconomic stability, currency, and co...
Daniel Walker
@Peter Martin It's not really about the EU. It's about Tom making a statement (implying that the process for electing the President of the European Commissi...
Tristan Ward
@ Jennie and @ Margaret Pollus "As for “biological sex” there is no such thing" Can I please point you at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisogamy wh...



4 Comments
Having read his comments about sex offenders registering their e-mail address and IP address so the police can track them, my first thought was indeed “Christ, Huhne!”. Closely followed by “Are we trying to make ourselves look like luddite idiots again?”
What Dave said.
I intend to do a bit of private work on technology policy after the Gen. Elec, probably as a summer hobby. Shame that Huhne is weaker on technology than his great research work over Ashcroft recently.
Why is what Huhne is suggesting any different from sex offenders having to register/notify changes in their address?
It isn’t that registering your email address, ISP, “IP address” (ok that bit is a bit luddite but range could be worked out from the ISP) is a measure that isn’t easily evaded but that it defines behaviour which is a clear breach of sex offender order conditions.
There are three options for internet access by sex offenders, no controls, a complete ban on access or access under certain defined conditions. I’m not sure either of the first two are particularly good options for the majority of situations.