Of course, I read that caption from earlier today as a mark of praise rather than of exasperation:
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
We need a healthy and free leadership debate (Rosemary Runswick)
-
Mathew on Monday: Davey has been given a second chance. Now he must show us what his leadership is for (Mathew Hulbert)
-
The decapitation strategy (Michael Taylor)
-
Welcome (belatedly) to my day: 12 October 2026 – a leadership challenge, or a challenge to the leadership?… (Mark Valladares)
-
Is Ed Davey toast? (Caron Lindsay)
Recent Comments
Robert Hale
Me too, Layla Moran!...
Rose Runswick
@Richard have you read Roz Savage's ...
Simon McGrath
"If we won 20 less Seats in the next General Election, but were so wholehearted about our principles our vote share went up everywhere else, I think I would app...
Richard Cripps
As a long-term Lib/Lib Dem voter, I have a great respect for Ed Davey. I believe him to be a sincere caring man who, as we know, delivered the best "centre part...
Paul Culloty
As Jana mentions, it wasn't the Spanish electoral system that ultimately hobbled Ciudadanos, rather it was down to the strategic choices made by the leadership ...




4 Comments
Having read his comments about sex offenders registering their e-mail address and IP address so the police can track them, my first thought was indeed “Christ, Huhne!”. Closely followed by “Are we trying to make ourselves look like luddite idiots again?”
What Dave said.
I intend to do a bit of private work on technology policy after the Gen. Elec, probably as a summer hobby. Shame that Huhne is weaker on technology than his great research work over Ashcroft recently.
Why is what Huhne is suggesting any different from sex offenders having to register/notify changes in their address?
It isn’t that registering your email address, ISP, “IP address” (ok that bit is a bit luddite but range could be worked out from the ISP) is a measure that isn’t easily evaded but that it defines behaviour which is a clear breach of sex offender order conditions.
There are three options for internet access by sex offenders, no controls, a complete ban on access or access under certain defined conditions. I’m not sure either of the first two are particularly good options for the majority of situations.