So why exactly did Alex Salmond miss Any Questions?

A bit of intrigue never goes amiss on a Saturday afternoon.

Last night, Alex Salmond missed Any Questions because, according to Jonathan Dimbleby at 1 minute 50 in: “apparently been held up in Scotland by the floods.” Certainly his Gordon constituency has been badly affected by some awful flooding in the north east of Scotland. In fact, Lib Dem MSP for North East Scotland Alison McInnes has been scathing about the SNP Government’s slow response, saying:

Here in the north-east local agencies have faced a prolonged battle against the rising water and staff and residents are exhausted. I do worry we haven’t seen the last of the bad weather but everyone has rallied together to support one another and the examples of community spirit have been heartening to see at such a difficult time.

Lessons need to be learnt on what’s happened in Scotland since the start of 2016 because I still think this response took place at a snail’s pace. The Scottish Government cannot keep forgetting that its responsibility is to the whole of Scotland, not just the central belt.

Salmond’s reason for missing Any Questions is kind of interesting. Especially seeing as he was in Westminster, outside Portcullis House at 1pm yesterday. How do we know this? Because he was spotted by our Party President:

He certainly was back in the constituency later on that evening, tweeting just before 3:

But why not just tell that to Any Questions? Everyone would have understood that he needed to be back home. Maybe he did and they got it wrong, but it certainly looks odd. Maybe someone should ask him. Is he on the radio any time soon….?

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • So can I get this straight? Alex Salmond was in his constituency on the evening of Friday 8 May talking to people affected by the floods. Any Questions goes out live on Friday night. So AQ saying that he was in his constituency was right. The LDs then base a SNPbad story on their President having seen AS in Westminster at lunchtime on Friday. Presumably AS got a.flight back to Aberdeen in the afternoon. Did anybody at LDV think to check this before demanding an explanation of something which doesn’t seem to need explaining g.

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 9th Jan '16 - 5:05pm

    The post says he was back in Inverurie, but AQ suggested that he had been held up in Scotland by the floods, not that he had gone back there to talk to his constituents.

    There’s just a discrepancy there that is easily explained – either Alex Salmond’s people told AQ that he had been held up in Scotland, or AQ got it wrong and should have said that he’d gone back home.

    There’s no problem with him being back in the constituency – he’s needed there and it’s good to see that after a week of hell for the locals, the SNP Government is finally doing something to help, just in time for Nicola’s visit today.

  • Anne Cunningham 10th Jan '16 - 9:43am

    I’m not sure who really cares but let’s look at this:

    The facts are that there are floods in Aberdeenshire. Aberdeen Airport was closed for a while. Salmond had been booked for AQ in Surrey, backed out, and a replacement was found. He was seen in the HoC at lunchtime on Friday and in his constituency by the evening. JD knew his absence had something to do with the floods and said so.

    Yet this has been blown up into another jibe at Salmond just for the sake of it and makes the Lib Dems look very petty and silly.

    This is almost as bad as complaining about him not being in the Commons for Cameron’s statement on Syria when he would have spoken against how the Lib Dems were told to vote the following week!

    What amuses me about this one is the whereabouts of Salmond at lunchtime on Friday. He was at work!

  • Anne Cunningham 10th Jan ’16 – 9:43am………. He was seen in the HoC at lunchtime on Friday and in his constituency by the evening. JD knew his absence had something to do with the floods and said so…………..Yet this has been blown up into another jibe at Salmond just for the sake of it and makes the Lib Dems look very petty and silly…………

    Quite so. Had Salmond attended AQ, I’m sure we would have read, “Alex Salmond ignores severe flooding in his Gordon constituency to appear on AQ”….

    On a weekend when it appears that two thirds of Tory MPs ‘want out of Europe’ we have time to play semantics over a brief statement from a talk show host….

  • Yes in my experience, you can explain perfectly clearly what the position is and yet, in true Chinese Whispers style, the recipient will mishear or change it to what they think the position is. It’s easily done ” Alex Sammond won’t be on AQ because his constituency is flooded” translated to ” AS stuck in floods in his constituency” . Honestly I don’t think there is anything to see here.

    Maybe a separate thread on the SNPs response to the floods?

  • with the SNP on 59% and the Lib Dems on 4% it is clear that the public think a lot more of the SNP than the Lib Dems. There is a chance that after May the Lib Dems won’t have to worry about what their MSPs are doing because there won’t be any.

    JD said El Presidente was held up in his constituency because possibly all he knew was that he was there and did not know he had been working in London earlier in the day.

    As a matter of interest what were the 8 Lib Dem MPs doing on friday afternoon and evening. Perhaps being a Lib Dem means that the Lib Dem President is not used to seeing politicians in Westminster on a friday.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGeoffrey Dron 22nd Aug - 3:29pm
    "...Jo Swinson has said recently, we have lost the art of disagreeing well. And well she might, for she is right! She, like me and...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 22nd Aug - 3:27pm
    Responding to the sixth paragaph of the OP: "At the same time there is virtual silence when it comes to the other major issues of...
  • User AvatarDavid Garlick 22nd Aug - 3:07pm
    If that is David's view then I have no doubt it is shared by others inside and outside the Party. Either we don't have the...
  • User AvatarMartin 22nd Aug - 3:02pm
    Michael BG: I do not understand why you believe we can expose incompetency to govern amongst the Tories (Johnson, A.B.deP, Williamson, Patel, Grayling, Raab, McVey...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 22nd Aug - 2:57pm
    TCO We agree on many aspects, but you should see homes and houses as more linked. The state treating people who have paid for their...
  • User AvatarDavid Warren 22nd Aug - 2:14pm
    @Thomas Thanks. You are spot on with regard to the Conservative party. As far as British industry is concerned I am far from happy with...
Sat 24th Aug 2019
Thu 29th Aug 2019
Mon 9th Sep 2019