Tag Archives: Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail

Mary Reid

Great British Railways?

By Mary Reid | Thu 20th May 2021 - 8:05 am

Embed from Getty Images

Late last night the news broke about the wide-reaching Government reform of the railways. In a couple of years time we will see the establishment of Great British Railways – which sounds more like a reality show, or a travelogue that features Michael Portillo’s yellow trousers.

According to the BBC, Great British Railways “will set timetables and prices, sell tickets in England and manage rail infrastructure”, that is, have control over both the physical network as well as the train operators.

I think we can all agree that the privatisation of the railways has not been a success. Quality has been inconsistent across the franchised rail networks, the fare structure has been a mystery to most travellers and there seems to be little central accountability for failures.

Are we really to believe that a right-leaning Conservative Government is planning to re-nationalise the railways? Undoubtedly the devil will be in the detail, so if you have had a chance to dissect the White Paper, known as by the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail, do please offer your comments or write us a post.

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged and | 40 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    @Jennie "It’ll blow your mind to discover that there are HUMANS that produce both gametes, or neither" I'm not aware of any examples of humans who produ...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Jennie "anyone who has had their ovaries removed or gone through menopause is no longer a woman" Obviously this is not correct. "Yes, the majority o...
  • cim
    As far as voting complexity goes, there's two separate bits to that. 1) How difficult it is to understand how to vote? Closed List is exactly equal to FPTP, ...
  • Tim Boura
    @Chloe You said "Fully understand that Mark. The problem is one set of rights should not take precedent over another. Does a female inmate have a right not t...
  • Jenny Barnes
    Seems to me that what most people mean by "biological sex" is "gender assigned at birth" . Gender. So the supreme court ruling makes very little sense....