This week has seen David Cameron trying to portray himself as some sort of equalities champion as he announced plans to force companies to disclose data on the gender pay gap. You would never have thought that his party had spent most of the last government fighting such a measure, only to finally agree it almost at the last minute. He may attempt to take the credit, but it’s Jo Swinson who did all the work. She tweeted:
No, Prime Minister, you are *RE*announcing gender pay transparency that @LibDems forced you to agree to months ago https://t.co/r82YgKVweV
— Jo Swinson (@joswinson) July 13, 2015
Back in March, Jo announced on this site that the Liberal Democrat policy was to become a reality. Here’s what she said back then:
In the final days of this Government Lib Dems are still delivering our agenda against the odds, and against Conservative obstruction.
Under the coalition government the gender pay gap had fallen to its lowest level, at just under 20% – but this is still 19.1% too high. Despite our high levels of women’s employment the UK has the 8th highest gender pay gap in the EU.
Not only is the gender pay gap socially wrong in modern society, but economically it’s nonsensical not to reward our most talented female employees properly. We should value the contribution of women and men in the workplace equally, so our goal has to be eliminating the pay gap completely.
As a Business Minister and Minister for Women, I have worked very hard to persuade my Coalition colleagues of the virtues of tough action to tackle this long-term inequality. Their traditional resistance makes it all the more remarkable that Nick Clegg has, in the last few weeks of our term, secured a government amendment that guarantees all large businesses will have to publish the difference between average pay for their male and female staff. So today (Tuesday) I will proudly vote for our party’s manifesto commitment – for large companies to publish the difference in average pay between male and female employees – to become law.
This is a significant win for women, and a political win for Liberal Democrats in Government. Amendments to the Small Business Bill, being debated in the House of Commons today (Tuesday), will fast-track our manifesto plans for gender pay transparency within the next 12 months. This will mean large companies – over 250 employees – will be legally required to publish the average pay of their male and female staff. It is our intention to create pressure from staff and customers to account for and close any pay gap that exists between men and women in large businesses. Women will know whether they are being properly rewarded for their endeavours: a situation that is good for competitive businesses and good for the economy.
As readers of Lib Dem Voice will know, we have argued for mandatory pay transparency since before the coalition was formed. We were the first major political party to commit to enforcing gender pay transparency by law. Labour might try to claim now that they would have done this in 2010 but actually their proposal was for voluntary publication for four years. This was something our champion for women, Lynne Featherstone objected to at the time – arguing against Labour’s delay that “pay audits are necessary and must be mandatory. We cannot wait another four years… voluntary pay audits are like waiting for Godot.”
In the wake of entrenched Conservative opposition, and in the context of Labour’s commitments while in government, we had to agree to try a voluntary approach first. We did so only on the condition that the decision would remain under review, and if this approach did not lead to more companies publishing the difference in pay between men and women, mandatory reporting would be introduced for large companies. During our time in government just five companies have chosen to publish their gender pay gap voluntarily. While I take my hat off to those who do – this is just not good enough.
Of course, the gender pay gap is not exactly an issue that the Conservative Party gets out of bed for. They were content to kick this issue into the long grass time and time again. Nick and I have made increasingly urgent appeals to our Conservative colleagues to address this. Which is why, today I am proud that we will go further than I expected. By securing a government amendment, Nick Clegg has successfully ensured that ministers on the government payroll will vote in favour of gender pay transparency, despite the Conservatives’ consistent efforts to block the proposals over the life of the coalition.
I could speculate about why the Tories have caved just weeks before the election – maybe the International Women’s Day celebrations caught the PM in a jovial mood? Or perhaps he feared that history (or the voters) would judge him for being on the wrong side of this argument. It may be that with some help from the Liberal Democrats, he simply read the political runes and didn’t want to countenance any risk to the successful passage of the Small Business Bill as the firm deadline of Parliament’s dissolution approached. Liberal Democrats can be proud that we have been the drivers of reforms to modernise the workplace to give women a fairer chance to get to the top of the career ladder. By extending flexible working to all employees, introducing Shared Parental Leave and revolutionising childcare, we are ensuring that there is greater equality at home and at work.
We can also be proud that – thanks to our term of stability in government – there are more women in work than ever before and women’s gross weekly earnings have increased between 2013 and 2014. Additionally we have banned pay secrecy clauses and introduced mandatory pay audits for companies that lose equal pay claims. The Government is also committed to tackling occupational segregation, and the outdated view that certain jobs are for “men-only”. Only 13% of engineers in this country are women – substantially lower than other European countries like Latvia, Sweden and Bulgaria. Through initiatives like “Your Life” we are encouraging young girls to get into STEM-related careers.
We have achieved a lot, but there is still much more to do. Equal pay and better gender representation in business is good for the economy as well as helping to create a fairer society. So any future coalition that contains Liberal Democrats will ensure this remains front and centre of our efforts in government.
It’s worth noting her comments that our policy was actually stronger than the Labour Party’s in 2010. They just wanted to have voluntary reporting.
This is just one of a number of things which will become law and have a positive long term effect in which Liberal Democrats can take pride.
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social



14 Comments
This was debated on the Daily Politics this week. The Tory woman argued about age and personal preference.
The Labour woman said that women were paid a premium for equal work and that girls also did better at school.
There was no Liberal Democrat present.
Fift percent of their presenters is a woman.
Jo Swinson may have done much of the work – she may have done all of it – but she worked for a Home Secretary and a Prime Minister who were both Tories. The plans announced this week were announced by a Tory Prime Minister representing a Tory government. I’m sure that Jo Swinson deserves a lot of credit, but without the Tories those plans would never have seen the light of day. Credit where credit is due.
Actually, no. This was a re-announcement of the plans already set in motion in March.
Announce or re-announcement without the Tories nothing would have happened.
I heard the announcement on the radio and thought to myself, “Hmm, that sounds like a leftover from our time in office”. And so it was. Special thanks to Jo Swinson.
Malc, from your argument it seriously appears you would also welcome the activities of counterfeiters on the basis that they had brought a product to wider public availability! This is political plagiarism, pure and simple.
malc. Is your logic that WW2 would not have happened without Neville Chamberlain so we should credit the Conservatives with that as well? Do give over.
Please do not get into World War 2 on this thread.
We might note that the TUC general secretary has said that she was working with Vince Cable on secure electronic balloting , but that the work has now stopped. There are probably several other such issues.
One of the mistakes the lib dems made in the election was trying to run away from their record in office.
Everyone already new about the bad things they did (tuition fees and the bedroom tax) but their was a lot of good as well.
Everything that happened in the last government the lib dems are responsible for, as are the Tories. It’s called collective responsibility.
The Tories seemed to stand on their record in office at the GE but the lib dems tried to runaway from bits of it and claim others.
The Tories can claim responsibility for the earnings disclosures and so can the lib dems. But when you try and runaway from some bits of your record it looks opportunistic when you try and claim others.
Norman Lamb’s speech to federal conference was nothing but good news about our record on health.
malc 15th Jul ’15 – 4:46pm
“Announce or re-announcement without the Tories nothing would have happened.”
And there we have it- the LibDems’ legacy of the last five years has been to make the Tories less toxic than they would have been if they had governed alone. I have lost track of the number of times people have said to me ‘ they can’t be that bad, they brought in same sex marriage or…{insert un-‘nasty’ good thing}’ and when I pointed out that the Lib Dems were responsible for that and all the other good things they say ‘ but the LIb Dems couldn’t have done it without the Tories agreeing so the Tories can’t be THAT bad’
It hasn’t been helped by the narrative of ‘ we only had 57 MPs so we couldn’t ….’ .
LDV Bongo:
Phyllis
“Tories […] toxic […] nasty […]”
LINE!
So much irritating nonsense. The Tories behaved at times as though they got into Government alone. They didn’t.
Without Liberal Democrats there would not have been stable government which could do things.
I never thought the public would thank us. And I am not surprised that the Tories and the media airbrush us out. It is so much simpler for them that way.
But it raises a danger. What other smaller Party will ever take part in Government, almost whatever the circumstances? That could be a recipe for instability and bad government. Mind, Tories are proving they can do bad government all by themselves.
Psi
???
Translation please.
During the coalition, the Tories would always use policies from the Lib Dems when showing how thoughtful they are.; tax threshold; pensions; mental health; equal marriage and so on. They would not have pushed for any of them- ” could not afford it ” Cameron said.
I don’t suppose it is possible to put a ten second advert on T.V. saying simply : ” Most people don’t know this, but this policy ( whatever) is coming in ; thanks to the Lib Dems being in government”