I always find it odd that, when we have had hundreds of Lib Dems discussing policy for days, we then have the leader announcing a major new policy in his speech, just as everyone’s about to go out the door.
In Spring it was a new British nuke, which we’ve mercifully not heard much about since. However the tax cut policy announced yesterday might have more longevity.
Basically we are going back to one of the really popular ideas from the coalition years, and raising the threshold at which you pay tax to £15,000. This is the idea initially brought forward by my Lib Dem Women colleague Lizzie Jewkes and which was talked about in a New Statesman podcast just last week. Lizzie was described as an “ordinary woman” and anyone who knows this very lovable force of nature will know she is as far from ordinary as you can get.
When we were in coalition, the Tories constantly claimed credit for this policy because it was so popular without mentioning that it was our idea, of course.
Anyway, the other proposal is that we would raise the threshold at which you pay the 40% tax rate to £56,000.
This would all be paid for by the benefits of rejoining the single market and customs union, proposals which we can probably all get behind.
The detail is set out n this article on the party website.
The Liberal Democrats will take 2.5 million people out of paying income tax altogether by raising the tax-free personal allowance to £15,000.
Our bold plan would put £680 back in people’s pockets, and also take 750,000 ordinary people out of paying the higher 40p tax rate.
People are struggling in a cost-of-living crisis. The Conservatives put their taxes up by stealth, and Labour have made it worse – the equivalent of a 3p rise in income tax.
There’s no way to end the cost-of-living crisis without cutting income tax. Liberal Democrats have done it before – cutting taxes by hundreds of pounds and taking 3.4 million people out of paying income tax altogether.
We’ll do it again now, taking 2.5 million people out of paying income tax and giving most people a £680 tax cut, by raising the tax-free personal allowance (and the national insurance threshold) to £15,000.
We’ll also raise the point at which the higher 40p rate of tax kicks in, taking more than 750,000 people out of paying it. Millions of ordinary people – including nurses and teachers – should not be paying a rate designed for stockbrokers and merchant bankers.
Unlike Reform, who claim they’d cut taxes by slashing £22 billion of support for disabled people, we’d pay for these tax cuts through the proceeds of growth when we tear down the damaging Brexit trade barriers.
Our plan for a new Growth and Defence Partnership with the EU is forecast to secure a growth dividend worth £27 billion a year. And we will give £17 billion of it straight back to the British people in the form of our tax cuts.
There is no doubt that most people could use an extra £700 ish per year as fuel costs rise and inflation looks set to bite again.
But is that the best use of the European dividend? Could it be better invested in improving this country’s infrastructure or public services?
Or is it a good idea to give something to a fairly large group of voters to build the range of votes we need across the country to advance?
What do you think?
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social



6 Comments
I think it was absolutely terrible on so many levels – unaffordable, unworkable, completely at odds with both the economic reality as it is and how the Lib Dems should operate as a party. I’d been thinking before the conference that, on balance, Ed Davey wasn’t the right person to lead the Lib Dems into the next election despite the success of 2024, and this policy has not only cemented that view for me, but also driven me to the brink of resigning my membership.
I donated £125 during the general election campaign to the party, and there’s no chance of a repeat while he and the others in his closed shop simultaneously announce economically illiterate policies and do nothing to advance or defend the cause of liberalism and liberal democracy (small ‘l’, small ‘d’).
Bad policy by leadership decree. Ill conceived in so many ways,
I agree with Peter Taylor. Ian Dunt’s latest blog and the ensuing comments (https://iandunt.substack.com/p/ed-davy-speech-just-not-good-enough?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=i6kt4) outlines everything that’s now wrong with the Liberal Democrats under Ed Davey’s leadership. We don’t want a repeat of the Charles Kennedy scenario in which a leader that had made a great contribution to the success of the party had to be forced out in public. It’s time for Ed Davey to pass on the mantle of leadership to someone with fire in their belly.
Tax policy is one of the most important areas of policy. An FPC working group should be studying all the evidence and putting a well thought out and detailed paper to conference. Regardless of what we think of the policy, bypassing party democracy in this way is unacceptable.
Well Ed got his 5 minutes of fame in terms of returning to an old policy on tax threasholds a policy i support as it effects low income households and pensioners both suffer from low threasholds ,however he was over shadowed by Burnshams visit to UN and meeting with Trump . The impact was lost by 6.00pm news .
Daisy Cooper as economy spokeperson will have to do the heavy lifting to give this more profile . lets see what additional traction we get by November and if it really moves the cutting through agenda the members want .
In principle, I agree with the policy. Although, i see the point that these conference policy announcements fly in the face of party democracy, all party leaders (without exception) love to make headline catching announcements in their conference speeches and I thought today’s Guardian was approving of the idea. The policy could form part of the party’s tax manifesto at the next election as part of a strategy of moving tax from income to accumulated wealth and land.