Why Gordon Brown should be voting for Jeremy Hunt tomorrow

Gordon BrownYesterday, at the Leveson Inquiry, Gordon Brown declined to take responsibility for the activities of his special advisers.

Tomorrow, Parliament debates whether Jeremy Hunt should take responsibility for the activities of one of his special advisers.

So I think we can work out which way Gordon Brown will be voting tomorrow, can’t we?

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • toryboysnevergrowup 12th Jun '12 - 7:50pm

    Because it will take attention away from all those LibDem MPs who cannot decide?

  • Mark, this piece should have been headed ‘Why LibDems will be voting against Jeremy Hunt tomorrow’.
    If this party is seen to have saved Jeremy Hunt it seems it cannot be saved from itself.

  • Elliot Bidgood 12th Jun '12 - 8:50pm

    I can vaguely understand the hypocrisy angle here, but not really. Since when does LDV care about Labour’s internal interfactional wars? All parties are afflicted by factional conflicts, clashes of ego and briefing. Jeremy Hunt, as a Secretary of State, has been directly or indirectly involved in unprofessional conduct with regard to BSkyB. Apples and oranges.

  • “Tomorrow, Parliament debates whether Jeremy Hunt should take responsibility for the activities of one of his special advisers.”

    No tomorrow Parliament votes on whether to ask the independent advisor to decide whether or not the Ministerial code was broken. Independence, openness clarity, things the Lib Dems I voted for said they believed in.

  • Bill Chapman 13th Jun '12 - 8:31am

    There is clearly a need for an investigation. Abstaining is an easy way out. I’m very disappointed with Nick Clegg. I hoped he might have an impact on this coalition.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Gwyn, I agree with David Raw about relative urgency. However, even in the list of political reforms, I would put changes to voting way below the changes that n...
  • Roland
    The key aspects of the Student loans system that needs to be guaranteed are: 1. Maximum percentage student loan repayment deduction from earnings subject to PA...
  • Phil Wainewright
    @Alan Jelfs - yes there is an important discussion to be had around government debt, but we need to distinguish between borrowing for investment and borrowing t...
  • Phil White
    Hope you're doing OK, Caron....
  • James Dennison
    Tim, I'm not convinced that 300 is too few - that is 150 MPs in a govt (at least) none of whom would have constituency duties. As well as elected (and non-elect...