Why you should Google your suppliers

An interesting piece in today’s Guardian with the news that Lord Sutherland, who chaired an inquiry into last year’s Sats test shambles in England, has pointed out that basic checking of the competency of a supplier can including Googling their name – but this wasn’t done when the Sats testing contract was awarded:

Giving evidence yesterday, Sutherland said: “I don’t know companies that don’t do that kind of probing, whether it’s by telephone or Googling.

“If you Google, first you get the press cuttings and then you say, ah no, that’s so and so but here’s a serious report that maybe we need to inquire into further – and that’s what wasn’t done.”

Sutherland agreed that such online probing could produce gossip, “but if they have publicly failed to deliver on contracts in previous years, I’m not talking about 1920 here but earlier within the current period of five, six, seven years, if it failed to deliver then, then you ask what have they done to improve their delivery and performance?”

You can read the full story here (and you may wish to smile ironically at the sight of a member of the House of Lords telling others on how to get in to the modern age, but he’s certainly right.)

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChris Cory 21st Jan - 6:37pm
    As John B has pointed out, the diversity of our parliamentary group has improved while the numbers have dwindled. One possible reason may be that...
  • User AvatarMark Pack 21st Jan - 6:32pm
    Graham Jeffs: we've never had a BAME council leader in the Lib Dems (as far as I've been able to find, despite a lot of...
  • User AvatarGordon 21st Jan - 6:28pm
    My postcard… Brexit was always a POLITICAL project. Remain lost because they never understood that. Now Leave, having won the political argument, has equally failed...
  • User AvatarMark Pack 21st Jan - 6:27pm
    The evidence is that if anything all-women shortlists *increase* the quality of candidates a party ends up standing overall: https://www.markpack.org.uk/137477/academics-say-impact-women-shortlists-quality-candidates/
  • User Avatarmarcstevens 21st Jan - 6:23pm
    All women shortlists discriminate against men and other genders. The referendu in 2016 was undemocratic as 16/17 year olds and EU nationals were excluded. If...
  • User AvatarPeter 21st Jan - 6:10pm
    @James - We had a people's vote in 2016 and Leave won. Why should we have another one? You want another one because you lost...