All hail, the amazing Baroness Jay

Let us give credit where credit is due. Baroness Jay, Labour member of the House of Lords and daughter of former Labour PM Jim Callaghan, appears to be remarkably sharp.

Until earlier today, everyone in the Labour party was categorising themselves into one of two groups:

(a) The “we didn’t know anything about the David Abrahams” group, and
(b) The “we knew about David Abrahams but didn’t think there was anything wrong with his approach to donations” group.

Step forward then, Baroness Jay. She tipped off the Hilary Benn for Deputy Leader campaign that the £5,000 it was being offered in the name of Janet Kidd was really from David Abrahams, and as a result his campaign rejected the donation. (Source: PA, and many other reports)

She therefore appears to be in the unique position of saying (a) she knew about David Abrahams’ approach to donations and (b) knew there was something wrong with it. Congratulations, Baroness.

Congratulations too to Sky journalist Joey Jones for getting to speak to Baroness Jay about what happened. You can read his interesting account over on the Sky News blog.

It does all leave one odd inconsistency though. According to Baroness Jay, David Abrahams approached her about donating “discretely” (i.e. via Janet Kidd). Yet according to Gordon Brown in his press conference today, it was Janet Kidd who approached his leadership campaign to donate funds (and was rejected, even though at the time she was on record as being a major Labour donor). Why would David Abrahams have approached the Harriet Harman campaign personally but the Gordon Brown campaign via an intermediary? Life is sometimes messy and inconsistent; or is there more to come out on this?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Derrick Chester 28th Nov '07 - 6:10am

    This whole thing is getting out of hand and the Government response totally out of proportion. If somebody gives a substantial amount of money directly to a Party and it is found that at some point in time that a decision was made which favoured the business they run, or they become a Peer, or they have done something wrong in law then they are accused of corruption. If they do not want to be identified and donate through other people (who admittedly should have been asked first) then they break the law. We are making it virtually impossible for political parties to be funded through donation in this country and the only route left is state funding. This removes the individual from the process accusations of wrongdoing. However Brown does not have the balls to go for this. It is not the very, very minor crime committed here which I find objectionable. It is the way the Government are going well over the top in reaction to this minor crime and jumping around to everyone elses tune. Weak, weak, weak.

  • Letters From A Tory 28th Nov '07 - 8:01am

    Well done Mr Pack – another interesting piece of a very disturbing puzzle.

  • any comments from the London hustings?

  • Did anyone hear Mr Abrams intervied on Newsnight last night? He said he had supported Hilary Benn for the leadership and put a cheque in his hand. He insisted he had supported Benn for the leadership with the implication, that Paxman explored, that he had not supported Harriet Harman. What’s going on there – epecially as the money was given after the campaign ended.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 27th Mar - 2:53am
    Incidentally, the reason that I think that pressure will continue to mount for a second referendum is in the rest of the polling. 49% are...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 27th Mar - 2:40am
    Hi Ben I welcome your change of mind. Unfortunately, posting on this topic tends to bring out the minority who are opposed to a referendum...
  • User AvatarScott 26th Mar - 11:02pm
    A security service is something you hire to guard an empty building site. Can we please stop using this term to refer to our secret...
  • User AvatarPeter 26th Mar - 10:38pm
    I recognise that our debate about domestic energy consumption is over, with Ms Featherstone making the concluding remarks. There is, however, a wider and more...
  • User AvatarGlenn 26th Mar - 9:54pm
    Laurence Cox. That's not entirely true. Labour was very split on membership of the EEC and joining was mainly driven by the Conservative Party. Tony...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 26th Mar - 9:33pm
    I wish that the ultra-europhiles in our party would not assume that everyone on the Remain side wants to see an european super-state. We need...