Oh well, it’s a good thing I included the words “so far” when I wrote this morning that, “Today’s round-up of Labour donation news looks pretty simple so far. Just the one story.”
Because here’s the second of the day.
It’s about Barbara Follett, whose husband has talked about how he provides over £100,000 per year to help run her constituency office.
One slight problem. None of the money seems to have been declared, which is a bit problematic when you start looking at the rules.
The Huntsman (from where I’ve got this story) has got all the details and poses these questions:
- Is the ‘subsidy’ of which he [Mr Follett] boasted actually financial support that is liable to registration by Mrs. Follett in the Register of MP’s interests?;
- If so, has the ‘subsidy’ in fact been registered in accordance with the rules?;
- Is this ‘subsidy’ a ‘controlled donation’ within the meaning of Schedule 7 paragraph 1(3) (c) of PPERA 2000?;
- If so, has a Mrs. Follett rendered a report of the ‘controlled donation’ as is required by Schedule 7 paragraph (10) of PPERA 2000 within the required period to the Electoral Commission?
I think you can guess the answers he gives.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Good news on political donations?
Conference booked
New chair of North Northamptonshire Council stands down over social media posts
Are Labour going to cross another red line?
David Allen
Peter Martin
Tristan Ward
One Comment
And should we be asking exactly why he needs to provide this support, given the fairly generous office and staff allowances which MPs have? If the money is being spent on political activity (eg leaflets/letters etc), that would certainly make it a political donation which would need to be declared. If not, then what is Barbara Follett spending her office allowance on?