Cabinet minutes on Iraq 2: Can you guess what Dominic Grieve said next?

So there he was, sat in the House of Commons listening to Jack Straw announce his decision to veto the Information Tribunal’s decision that the Cabinet minutes of the decision to go to war in Iraq should be released.

Up he then got, and this is what Dominic Grieve said:

The Secretary of State’s decision to use his powers of veto in this case classically illustrates what has been wrong with the Government’s approach to freedom of information.

and

The public have had their expectations about openness raised by Labour’s spin and propaganda, only to be brought down to earth.

and

Does he [Jack Straw] recall the words at that time of the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent, Central (Mark Fisher), who said that that veto basically allowed the Home Secretary, as he then was, “to put a razor through the whole bill”?

and

Does the Secretary of State appreciate how it will appear to the public for someone so closely involved in the key decisions to be now personally blocking the release of that information?

So now your quiz question: how did Dominic Grieve go on to complete this sentence: “The Secretary of State’s decision is the …”? Did he say (a) “wrong one” or (b) “right one”?

Don’t be misled by all that Dominic Grieve said in the prior few minutes. For yes, he backed Jack Straw’s decision. So much for the Conservatives’ support for freedom and civil liberties. In fact, it is the second time in two days that the party has shed light on what may have driven David David to resign, for on Monday it held a policy launch with David Cameron where:

David Cameron yesterday downgraded the Tories’ commitment to civil liberties.

Should make for some interesting questions at the weekend when a phalanx of Conservatives will be descending on the Convention on Modern Liberty to argue the case they’re really, really changed, honest guv. February excepted.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarFiona 9th Dec - 6:46pm
    Many are suggesting, reasonably, that these results suggest a return to our 2010 form, but that doesn't mean it's not significant. Many of our voters...
  • User AvatarChris Cory 9th Dec - 6:40pm
    @Tom Papworth. I take your point, but I don't doubt that many people hate their jobs. Whether a lot of people already have enough "stuff"...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 9th Dec - 6:12pm
    Helen, I think the concept of a steady state economy is to0 close to the Malthusian catastrophe hypothesis for comfort, with its premise that there...
  • User AvatarJohn Peters 9th Dec - 5:42pm
    What you want to do is force your opinion on everyone else. Is that liberal? If an employer wants to take into account an applicant's...
  • User AvatarHelen Flynn 9th Dec - 5:34pm
    Thanks for all the comments so far! Glad to have stirred up some debate. No one seems to refer to the fact that our young...
  • User AvatarBen Andrew 9th Dec - 5:21pm
    I'm aware that the rehabilitation of offenders act allows many convictions to become spent after a period of time. That's not what I'm arguing for....