Cabinet minutes on Iraq 2: Can you guess what Dominic Grieve said next?

So there he was, sat in the House of Commons listening to Jack Straw announce his decision to veto the Information Tribunal’s decision that the Cabinet minutes of the decision to go to war in Iraq should be released.

Up he then got, and this is what Dominic Grieve said:

The Secretary of State’s decision to use his powers of veto in this case classically illustrates what has been wrong with the Government’s approach to freedom of information.


The public have had their expectations about openness raised by Labour’s spin and propaganda, only to be brought down to earth.


Does he [Jack Straw] recall the words at that time of the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent, Central (Mark Fisher), who said that that veto basically allowed the Home Secretary, as he then was, “to put a razor through the whole bill”?


Does the Secretary of State appreciate how it will appear to the public for someone so closely involved in the key decisions to be now personally blocking the release of that information?

So now your quiz question: how did Dominic Grieve go on to complete this sentence: “The Secretary of State’s decision is the …”? Did he say (a) “wrong one” or (b) “right one”?

Don’t be misled by all that Dominic Grieve said in the prior few minutes. For yes, he backed Jack Straw’s decision. So much for the Conservatives’ support for freedom and civil liberties. In fact, it is the second time in two days that the party has shed light on what may have driven David David to resign, for on Monday it held a policy launch with David Cameron where:

David Cameron yesterday downgraded the Tories’ commitment to civil liberties.

Should make for some interesting questions at the weekend when a phalanx of Conservatives will be descending on the Convention on Modern Liberty to argue the case they’re really, really changed, honest guv. February excepted.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 28th Oct - 10:34pm
    @William Ross Lovely of you to say that my contribution is "amazing".... Just to be clear, I set out two possible scenarios against the suggestion...
  • User AvatarAlan Depauw 28th Oct - 10:32pm
    Stevan : Supply chains are very lean and very international. Throw spanners into them, like tariff and especially non-tariff barriers and they will seize up....
  • User Avatarpaul barker 28th Oct - 10:28pm
    If we assume similar vote changes in Richmond Park to those in Witney, we get a tie with both Tories & us around 40% or...
  • User AvatarJohn Peters 28th Oct - 9:22pm
    "They seek to prevent parliamentary dissent by pretending it was the voters decision, but it was not." Are you sure? "Should the United Kingdom remain...
  • User AvatarTim 28th Oct - 9:11pm
    Most people voted in the referendum the way they thought would be in their best economic interest. You don't know why people voted as they...
  • User AvatarJonathan Brown 28th Oct - 9:10pm
    I think Lester makes a very important point. If we don't look at 'factors that work against participation for BAME members' then what's the point...