Cabinet minutes on Iraq 2: Can you guess what Dominic Grieve said next?

So there he was, sat in the House of Commons listening to Jack Straw announce his decision to veto the Information Tribunal’s decision that the Cabinet minutes of the decision to go to war in Iraq should be released.

Up he then got, and this is what Dominic Grieve said:

The Secretary of State’s decision to use his powers of veto in this case classically illustrates what has been wrong with the Government’s approach to freedom of information.

and

The public have had their expectations about openness raised by Labour’s spin and propaganda, only to be brought down to earth.

and

Does he [Jack Straw] recall the words at that time of the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent, Central (Mark Fisher), who said that that veto basically allowed the Home Secretary, as he then was, “to put a razor through the whole bill”?

and

Does the Secretary of State appreciate how it will appear to the public for someone so closely involved in the key decisions to be now personally blocking the release of that information?

So now your quiz question: how did Dominic Grieve go on to complete this sentence: “The Secretary of State’s decision is the …”? Did he say (a) “wrong one” or (b) “right one”?

Don’t be misled by all that Dominic Grieve said in the prior few minutes. For yes, he backed Jack Straw’s decision. So much for the Conservatives’ support for freedom and civil liberties. In fact, it is the second time in two days that the party has shed light on what may have driven David David to resign, for on Monday it held a policy launch with David Cameron where:

David Cameron yesterday downgraded the Tories’ commitment to civil liberties.

Should make for some interesting questions at the weekend when a phalanx of Conservatives will be descending on the Convention on Modern Liberty to argue the case they’re really, really changed, honest guv. February excepted.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/11714 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMack (Not a Lib Dem) 20th Aug - 3:21pm
    @ Simon Shaw "Could you explain what part of either Labour’s or the Coalition Government’s Bedroom Taxes are backdated" Again you've missed the point. Labour's...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Aug - 3:18pm
    A tiny little earthquake, that did no damage, and that might or might not have been caused by fracking, could easily turn into a huge...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Aug - 3:12pm
    The slippery slope fallacy is what the proponents of climate change base their case on. A small change of temperature over a short time period...
  • User Avatarcogload 20th Aug - 3:01pm
    You may expect the Unionists to be negotiating on the basis of minimal change re the pound. However your expectations are somewhat incorrect.
  • User AvatarMack (Not a Lib Dem) 20th Aug - 2:59pm
    @ Matt and Stuart I am attaching a link to an excellent summation of the contrasts between Labour's Housing Allowance ,2008 (What Simon Shaw call...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 20th Aug - 2:50pm
    @ Daft ha' porth, Thank you for your informative post. It is greatly appreciated. You are correct, the reports are not terribly readable , especially...