Cabinet minutes on Iraq 2: Can you guess what Dominic Grieve said next?

So there he was, sat in the House of Commons listening to Jack Straw announce his decision to veto the Information Tribunal’s decision that the Cabinet minutes of the decision to go to war in Iraq should be released.

Up he then got, and this is what Dominic Grieve said:

The Secretary of State’s decision to use his powers of veto in this case classically illustrates what has been wrong with the Government’s approach to freedom of information.


The public have had their expectations about openness raised by Labour’s spin and propaganda, only to be brought down to earth.


Does he [Jack Straw] recall the words at that time of the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent, Central (Mark Fisher), who said that that veto basically allowed the Home Secretary, as he then was, “to put a razor through the whole bill”?


Does the Secretary of State appreciate how it will appear to the public for someone so closely involved in the key decisions to be now personally blocking the release of that information?

So now your quiz question: how did Dominic Grieve go on to complete this sentence: “The Secretary of State’s decision is the …”? Did he say (a) “wrong one” or (b) “right one”?

Don’t be misled by all that Dominic Grieve said in the prior few minutes. For yes, he backed Jack Straw’s decision. So much for the Conservatives’ support for freedom and civil liberties. In fact, it is the second time in two days that the party has shed light on what may have driven David David to resign, for on Monday it held a policy launch with David Cameron where:

David Cameron yesterday downgraded the Tories’ commitment to civil liberties.

Should make for some interesting questions at the weekend when a phalanx of Conservatives will be descending on the Convention on Modern Liberty to argue the case they’re really, really changed, honest guv. February excepted.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User Avatarmalc 25th Nov - 11:35pm
    I also agree with Willie. Lets hope this very worthy rally is well supported and gets the media coverage it deserves.
  • User Avatarnigel hunter 25th Nov - 11:34pm
    Islam is a religion like all others, non perfect, that also counts for agnostics and atheist who believe in their thoughts. Islamists terrorists are still...
  • User Avatarnigel hunter 25th Nov - 11:16pm
    It s true we are entering a WW1 scenario, a war, followed by a carve up that has partly led to the present mess.. Yes...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 25th Nov - 10:55pm
    SJ: If you cannot belong to a party because of the religious beliefs of the leader, you are not a Liberal. You cannot be sure...
  • User AvatarGlenn 25th Nov - 10:38pm
    Ddie, I understand your point, but I'd argue that pragmatism actually suggests not blundering deeper into a mess that has actively worsened the situation in...
  • User AvatarRoland 25th Nov - 10:26pm
    @Jedibeeftrix - I would put it slightly differently... From several decades of experience of working with the Dutch (and other Europeans), I've found them to...