Cameron’s conundrum

As Margaret Thatcher famously said, “U-turn if you want to” – and how David Cameron’s Tory party has taken this advice to heart.

No ‘Team Cameron’ proposal is now complete without the obligatory clarification reversal once the policy’s unpopularity – either with the party (grammar schools) or the public (free museum entrance) – is revealed.

As predicted on LDV yesterday, the suggestion from Hugo Swire, the Tories’ culture spokesman (and Eton and Sotheby’s alumnus), that a future Tory Government would reverse Labour’s free museums admissions policy has been swiftly jettisoned:

Conservative party officials moved quickly to dampen the row yesterday, claiming the shadow Culture Secretary was referring only to the party’s last election manifesto.
Mr Swire said later: “It is not our policy to bring back admission fees to museums and galleries and we are committed to the principle of free admission.
“We have instigated a wide-ranging review of arts policy under the stewardship of Sir John Tusa [and] we await [his] recommendation before we announce any policy on the arts.” (Today’s Independent.)

Given the currently febrile state of the Tory party, political opponents might be forgiven for relishing the forthcoming spate of policy reviews commissioned by Mr Cameron, and which are due soon to report.

Will the Tory leader choose to disappoint his party – by putting forward moderate, progressive and green policies? Or will he choose to disappoint the public – by putting forward a similarly right-wing manifesto to the one he wrote for the Tories in 2005?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • nigel hunter
    Can we have,will there be a debate at conference where a new mindset can be discussed?...
  • Judy Abel
    @David agree with those points. There are no checks and balances when it comes to how capital operates in our markets....
  • David Allen
    "I think you could claim that a dogmatic insistence on a single ownership model has failed." Fair point, up to a point. Certainly - as I mentioned - nationa...
  • Mick Taylor
    There seems to be a schizophrenic approach by our party when talking about high streets. On the one hand people bemoan the decline of high streets and on the ot...
  • David Raw
    @ theakes "But we have to attack them"...... But that assumes anybody is even listening to the Lib Dems these days............. Most of the time there seems ...