Looks like the new week will be much like the old week when it comes to Labour infighting, for Monday’s Times brings us a letter from Charles Clarke in which he lays into Ed Balls:
His injunctions about the “indulgent nonsense” of “private briefings against the Labour leader” certainly come from one who is well acquainted with this kind of activity. Such things do discredit politics and take us back to the days of faction and party-within-a-party that were so damaging in the 1980s…
It’s certainly true that many Labour MPs, including myself, are disappointed by policy decisions such as the abolition of the 10p tax rate, the over-bureaucratic and insensitive nature of the post office closure programme, and the problems arising from lack of preparation for a Northern Rock-style economic challenge. These all stem from Treasury positions with which he is very familiar. It’s also true that many, including myself, are disappointed with many aspects of his education policies, of which the most serious is the absence of a coherent and focused reform strategy for the 14-19 curriculum, along the lines of Mike Tomlinson’s proposals.
As far as his remarks about “falling for false prophets” are concerned, I would advise him to examine himself and his own role. He should stop attacking others anonymously or in code and look to his own performance and record.
Ouch.
Share:
2 Comments
Why didn’t Charles Clarke make this much sense when he worked at the Home Office?
http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com
Think Balls could respond simply: “So Weak!” CC is constantly up himself, bitter, twisted, and a serial failure in office. Still at least we are making some progress from a man in Weston, via an outrider PPC in Cumbria, to a grumpy has been.