If English Council meets and nobody knows, did it really meet?

Saturday morning dawned bright and sunny, but whilst most people heading for London were on their way to Pride, or Lords for the cricket, or Wimbledon for the tennis, a few dozen hardy Liberal Democrats were heading towards the St Alban’s Centre near Chancery Lane station for the first of 2010’s two meetings of English Council.

Unusually, the first item on the agenda was a speech by the Party President, Ros Scott, who talked about the challenges facing the Party in the weeks, months and years ahead, as well as some of the work being done at Federal level to address them. She noted that, whilst the Special Conference had been an expensive affair, it had been vital to allow members from across the country to have their say about such a critical decision.

She also touched upon issues such as diversity, the importance of maintaining the Party’s independence of thought and action beyond Westminster, and the opportunities for Regional Parties to feed into polict making, before fielding questions on subjects as diverse as security at future Federal Conferences and how policy defence and attack lines can be fed to local campaigners from Government. And then she was gone, to join the Liberal Democrat cohort at Pride.

Reports from the Chair and Treasurer of the English Party followed, although most of Jonathan Davies’s best lines had been spoken by President Scott before leaving (that’s why he normally goes first…), before we moved on to the first piece of serious business, the motion calling for ratification of the new Selection Rules for Westminster. The case was made by two members of the Working Group that had produced the document, Sal Jarvis and myself, noting that issues of administrative burden, diversity and candidate campaigning had been addressed as far as was possible, producing a twin-track approach which left a rigorous process in place for target and priority seats, whilst allowing development seats to apply a rather more ‘cut down’ version. Despite some misgivings, with a few present suggesting that potential priority seats might try to manipulate the position to avoid the more onerous process, the Rules were ratified with no more than four votes against.

Reports from various English Council representatives to other bodies followed before lunch, leaving the afternoon session for a review of the General Election campaign. This saw an English Council first, with Andrew Stunell becoming the first Minister ever to address such an event. Andrew’s key role in the campaign allowed him to give a very candid overview of what happened, including the strengths and weaknesses which influenced the final outcome.

I have to confess that some of the comments that followed verged on whinging, with a number of quite barbed attacks on the performance of the Campaigns Department. These were rebutted to some extent by Ian Horner, East of England’s Campaigns Officer, with support from others, but there is no doubt that there are reservations as to the efficacy of our campaigning methods. And with the likelihood of a reformed second chamber to be elected by regional list-based STV, our target-orientated strategy may need a major overhaul.

And so, the meeting broke up, leaving us to head back to our Regions and reflect on the work to be done…

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds and Party policy and internal matters.


  • Thanks Mark for the report

    Mind you I still dream of the day that English Council is abolished and the English regions given the same status as Welsh or Scottish state parties. With some things like PPC rules being decided at federal level for all of Britain

    but that is just me…

  • Lloyd – Problem for you guys is, can the english regions afford financially to have the same infrastructure as the welsh and scottish parties?

  • Yes, please please abolish the English Party and the wasteful travel allowances for the immeasurably tedious English Council meetings. The sooner the better …

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 25th Oct - 3:23am
    We can all trade anecdotes and I am sure that the vast majority of people are getting on with each other as well as ever....
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 25th Oct - 3:04am
    Hear hear to Gareth Hartwell above. The thread was extremely light on comments which recognise that this news is both bad for the EU and...
  • User AvatarJonathan Ferguson 25th Oct - 2:54am
    1. I'm all for commenting on innovative ideas like the Land Tax (it may not be new, but it's innovative in the sense that it...
  • User AvatarManfarang 24th Oct - 11:48pm
    Roland "there is a problem with immigration" I can't remember a time in the last 50 years when people in Britain didn't say there was...
  • User Avatarmalc 24th Oct - 11:43pm
    My local towns are as multicultural as most and I just don't see what Tim Farron sees. The local papers rarely - if ever -...
  • User Avatarfrankie 24th Oct - 11:19pm
    jedibeeftrix Hard brexit may well result in higher growth in the long term, as regulatory and tax divergence from the EU ensues. but how long...